信頼度
2役職
Role:President (ARIN)未評価履歴情報
Role:Board member (ICANN)未評価履歴情報
人物プロフィール
人物Ray Plzak
公開記録では、Ray Plzak はインターネット基盤に関わる意思決定、訴訟、ガバナンス、または運用に関係する人物として確認されています。
確認できる情報は役割: President (ARIN)を網羅しています。
- 役割
- President (ARIN)
人物プロフィール
人物公開記録では、Ray Plzak はインターネット基盤に関わる意思決定、訴訟、ガバナンス、または運用に関係する人物として確認されています。
確認できる情報は役割: President (ARIN)を網羅しています。
出典に基づく事実
見解の一貫性: 一貫性を評価するには証拠が不十分です
The statement explains why staff use customer location information for verification and expressly disclaims an argument for or against the policy. Operational need for a verification input does not by itself establish opposition to privacy protections. With only this contribution, there is no sequence of explicit positions to compare.
2006-1: Residential Customer Privacy
評価: 一貫性を評価するには証拠が不十分です · The statement explains why staff use customer location information for verification and expressly disclaims an argument for or against the policy. Operational need for a verification input does not by itself establish opposition to privacy protections. With only this contribution, there is no sequence of explicit positions to compare.
条件: This assessment concerns the retained April 2006 staff explanation, not every contribution Plzak made to ARIN discussions. · The message neither establishes the policy outcome nor specifies every circumstance in which the location information is used.
It was not an argument for or against the policy. The staff comment was that the information was still required for purpose of verification.
City/state/postal code of individual users is a part of the metrics that are used by staff. We will confirm that we do use it.
見解の一貫性: 明示的な立場は示されていません