- Telecom industry groups are seeking to block the Biden administration’s reinstatement of net neutrality rules set to take effect on July 22.
- In April, the FCC voted along party lines to reclaim regulatory oversight of broadband internet and reinstate the open internet rules first adopted in 2015.
- ISPs argue that stringent regulations can stifle innovation and investment in network infrastructure.
OUR TAKE
Net neutrality ensures that internet service providers treat all data equally, preventing practices like blocking, throttling, and paid prioritisation. This can promote a fair and open internet, where small businesses and startups have an equal opportunity to reach users.
–Jinny Xu, BTW reporter
Telecom industry groups are pushing back against the Biden administration’s move to reinstate net neutrality rules, aiming to block regulations set to take effect on July 22 that would bar internet service providers from discriminating against lawful online content.
FCC votes to reinstate net neutrality
In April, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted along party lines to reclaim regulatory oversight of broadband internet and reinstate the open internet rules first adopted in 2015. These rules, which had been rescinded under the Trump administration, prevent internet service providers from blocking or slowing down traffic to specific websites and from engaging in paid prioritisation of lawful content. Additionally, the rules empower the FCC to take action against Chinese telecom companies and monitor internet service outages.
Also read: What are the challenges of internet governance?
Also read: What is network optimisation in telecoms?
Legal challenges from industry groups
In response, industry groups representing major companies like AT&T, Comcast, and Verizon have filed legal challenges in seven U.S. circuit courts. These groups, including USTelecom, NCTA, CTIA, and ACA Connects, have requested the FCC to delay the implementation of the order, allowing them to seek judicial review or obtain a court-issued order to temporarily block the new rules.
ISPs argue that stringent regulations can stifle innovation and investment in network infrastructure. They contend that the freedom to manage network traffic and offer premium services is essential for funding improvements and expanding access, especially in underserved areas.
FCC’s stance
FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel has assured that the commission will not engage in rate regulation or undermine incentives for network investment. Democrats had been unable to push these regulations for nearly three years due to a lack of majority control in the five-member FCC until October.
