Tim McGinnis

Tim McGinnis est suivi comme personne, avec des elements qui eclairent son identite, son role ou son contexte operationnel.

Les données disponibles couvrent Rôles: IP Analyst / Hostmaster / LIR Trainer (2002–2005) (RIPE NCC).

Dernière observation 2026-09-25

Rôles: IP Analyst / Hostmaster / LIR Trainer (2002–2005) (RIPE NCC)

Preuves

Type d'information: Tim McGinnis merite d'etre suivi car les changements de role, de relations, de position de gouvernance ou de perimetre operationnel peuvent affecter les operations reseau et la visibilite du marche.

Détails associés

Tim McGinnis
Appuie l'identite, le role ou le contexte organisationnel de Tim McGinnis.
public people profile

Dernière mise à jour: 2026-09-25

Rôles

Role:IP Analyst / Hostmaster / LIR Trainer (2002–2005) (RIPE NCC)Non évaluéHistorique

Role:Education Manager and Lead Trainer (2012) (Internet Systems Consortium)Non évaluéHistorique

Role:Former Policy Development Working Group Co-chair (reported in 2015) (AFRINIC)Non évaluéHistorique

Faits sourcés

Participation aux politiques RIR

1RIR concernés

9Politiques suivies

48Messages de politique

7 mai 2008Première participation

7 déc. 2014Dernière participation

afpub-2008-gen-001hereInconnue · 9 Messages de discussion
Cohérence du point de vue: Aucune position explicite n’a été énoncée
AFPUB-2012-DNS-001No Reverse Unless AssignedSoutien avec modifications · 6 Messages de discussion
Cohérence du point de vue: Cohérent
Tim continues to seek better assignment registration while revising the enforcement mechanism and clarifying its scope. He explicitly uses discretionary removal authority and explains that direct end-user assignments already entered by registry staff can receive reverse delegation. In June 2013 he offers to withdraw if the community rejects this approach; that conditional offer does not contradict his original invitation to find a better solution.
No Reverse Unless Assigned
Évaluation: Cohérent · Tim continues to seek better assignment registration while revising the enforcement mechanism and clarifying its scope. He explicitly uses discretionary removal authority and explains that direct end-user assignments already entered by registry staff can receive reverse delegation. In June 2013 he offers to withdraw if the community rejects this approach; that conditional offer does not contradict his original invitation to find a better solution.
Réserves: The draft's MAY wording permits rather than mandates removal of reverse delegation. · The author qualifies his recollection about staff registration; his explanation is not a new adopted policy text. · The June message neither records an actual withdrawal nor proves the absence of community support.
17 avr. 2012
someone will have a better idea about how to encourage the registration of assignments.
5 déc. 2012
pls note, I have used a "MAY" instead of a "SHALL" or a "MUST" in 3.3.
17 déc. 2012
In short, no, it doesn't apply to end-user space.
19 juin 2013
If there is no consensus that this is the way to rectify the problem of getting people to register their assignments, I would be happy to withdraw this proposal
afpub-2012-gen-002Regional Internet Registry Privacy | AFPUB-2012-GEN-002-DRAFT-02Inconnue · 1 Messages de discussion
Cohérence du point de vue: Éléments insuffisants pour évaluer la cohérence
As PDWG co-chair, Tim apologizes for delayed communication and offers an Open Policy Hour slot for the privacy proposal. This is facilitation of discussion, not evidence of support, opposition or a change in his personal privacy position.
Regional Internet Registry Privacy | AFPUB-2012-GEN-002-DRAFT-02
Évaluation: Éléments insuffisants pour évaluer la cohérence · As PDWG co-chair, Tim apologizes for delayed communication and offers an Open Policy Hour slot for the privacy proposal. This is facilitation of discussion, not evidence of support, opposition or a change in his personal privacy position.
Réserves: Only a scheduling exchange is included for this policy.
11 mai 2012
would it be ok if we put it in the Open Policy Hour with the other proposals that were made after the deadline?
AFPUB-2012-V4-001AFPUB-2012-V4-001-DRAFT-01Soutien · 2 Messages de discussion
Cohérence du point de vue: Éléments insuffisants pour évaluer la cohérence
Tim introduces the 2012 Anycast proposal as a starting point for discussion. This establishes advocacy at that time, but the single reviewed message cannot show whether his position stayed unchanged through later revisions.
AFPUB-2012-V4-001-DRAFT-01
Évaluation: Éléments insuffisants pour évaluer la cohérence · Tim introduces the 2012 Anycast proposal as a starting point for discussion. This establishes advocacy at that time, but the single reviewed message cannot show whether his position stayed unchanged through later revisions.
Réserves: Submitting a strawman does not establish consensus or endorsement of every later draft.
17 avr. 2012
Below is the proposal on Anycast I submitted to pdwg last week.
AFPUB-2012-V4-001-DRAFT-01 · Anycast resource assignments in the AFRINIC region
Évaluation: Cohérent · His introduction of an Anycast proposal in 2012 and support for clarification and adoption of the 2014 Anycast proposal show compatible advocacy for an Anycast policy path. They do not establish that the two proposals have identical text or that he endorsed every intervening version.
Réserves: The comparison concerns the positions expressed in these messages, not equivalence between the policy versions.
17 avr. 2012
Below is the proposal on Anycast I submitted to pdwg last week.
28 nov. 2014
sure, I am all for future proofing as APB suggests.
7 déc. 2014
AFPUB-2013-GEN-001AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02Inconnue · 3 Messages de discussion
Cohérence du point de vue: Aucune position explicite n’a été énoncée
AFPUB-2013-V4-001AFPUB-2013-V4-001-DRAFT-01Inconnue · 5 Messages de discussion
Cohérence du point de vue: Aucune position explicite n’a été énoncée
afpub-2014-gen-003Anycast resource assignments in the AFRINIC regionSoutien · 3 Messages de discussion
Cohérence du point de vue: Cohérent
Tim supports clarifying and future-proofing the 2014 Anycast proposal, then states that he is in favor during last call. The later brief endorsement is compatible with his earlier support for clarification; it does not itself prove that every suggested change was incorporated.
Anycast resource assignments in the AFRINIC region
Évaluation: Cohérent · Tim supports clarifying and future-proofing the 2014 Anycast proposal, then states that he is in favor during last call. The later brief endorsement is compatible with his earlier support for clarification; it does not itself prove that every suggested change was incorporated.
Réserves: The final short endorsement supplies no further reasons or implementation evidence.
28 nov. 2014
sure, I am all for future proofing as APB suggests.
28 nov. 2014
I would support the change that Alan suggests in the interests of clarity.
7 déc. 2014
in favor.
AFPUB-2012-V4-001-DRAFT-01 · Anycast resource assignments in the AFRINIC region
Évaluation: Cohérent · His introduction of an Anycast proposal in 2012 and support for clarification and adoption of the 2014 Anycast proposal show compatible advocacy for an Anycast policy path. They do not establish that the two proposals have identical text or that he endorsed every intervening version.
Réserves: The comparison concerns the positions expressed in these messages, not equivalence between the policy versions.
17 avr. 2012
afpub-2014-gen-004Resource Reservations for Internet Exchange PointsInconnue · 2 Messages de discussion
Cohérence du point de vue: Aucune position explicite n’a été énoncée
AFPUB-2026-IPv4-001-DRAFT02IPv4 Soft LandingInconnue · 17 Messages de discussion
Cohérence du point de vue: Aucune position explicite n’a été énoncée