Cómo una nota eliminó a seis solicitantes de .HOTEL

Resumen

• El informe de 2014 otorgó 15 puntos, por encima del umbral de 14 del Manual del Solicitante.
• Reconsideración, Ombudsman e IRP revisaban proceso o estatutos; ninguno era un segundo evaluador con libertad para puntuar de nuevo.

Análisis

El juicio fáctico vino del proveedor externo, pero la fuerza excluyente procedía de las reglas de ICANN. La nota cambió el estado de las solicitudes, no firmó un contrato. Revisiones posteriores examinaron comunicaciones y coherencia sin reabrir el resultado; un IRP terminó en 2023 tras retirarse todas las pretensiones. ICANN registra un acuerdo en 2025, mientras .HOTEL seguía ausente de IANA al publicar. Prioridad, contrato y delegación fueron decisiones separadas.

Fuentes

• https://newgtldprogram.icann.org/sites/default/files/documents/cpe-vendor-evaluation-guide-panel-process-procedures-en.pdf
• https://newgtldprogram.icann.org/sites/default/files/documents/new-gtld-program-2026-round-applicant-guidebook-current-en.pdf
• https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb/string-contention-procedures-04jun12-en.pdf
• https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/cpe
• https://newgtlds.icann.org/sites/default/files/tlds/hotel/hotel-cpe-1-1032-95136-en.pdf
• https://www.iana.org/domains/root/db
• https://www.icann.org/en/board-activities-and-meetings/materials/approved-resolutions-regular-meeting-of-the-icann-board-10-03-2016-en
• https://www.icann.org/en/board-activities-and-meetings/materials/approved-resolutions-regular-meeting-of-the-icann-board-15-03-2018-en
• https://www.icann.org/en/board-activities-and-meetings/materials/approved-resolutions-regular-meeting-of-the-icann-board-27-01-2019-en
• https://www.icann.org/en/board-activities-and-meetings/materials/approved-resolutions-special-meeting-of-the-icann-board-09-08-2016-en
• https://www.icann.org/en/board-activities-and-meetings/materials/approved-resolutions-special-meeting-of-the-icann-board-17-09-2016-en
• https://www.icann.org/en/registry-agreements/details/hotel
• https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/cpe-process-review-scope-1-communications-between-icann-cpe-provider-13dec17-en.pdf
• https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/cpe-process-review-scope-2-cpe-criteria-analysis-13dec17-en.pdf
• https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/cpe-process-review-scope-3-cpe-provider-reference-material-compilation-redacted-13dec17-en.pdf
• https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/determination-despegar-online-et-al-11oct14-en.pdf
• https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/determination-despegar-online-et-al-22aug14-en.pdf
• https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/irp-cep-status-24jul26-en.pdf
• https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/irp-despegar-online-et-al-final-declaration-12feb16-en.pdf
• https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/irp-fegistry-et-al-panel-order-termination-18oct23-en.pdf
• https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/reconsideration-16-11-trs-et-al-bamc-recommendation-request-16nov18-en.pdf
• https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/irp-fegistry-et-al-v-icann-hotel-2019-12-20-en
• https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/ombudsman-framework-2004-12-03-en
• https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/reconsideration-16-11-trs-et-al-request-2016-08-25-en