- iwantmyname’s evolution from a New Zealand-founded domain service to part of a global group raises concerns about regional autonomy and offshore decision-making.
- Users benefit from scale and stability, but mixed feedback on pricing, support and local responsiveness highlights tensions between global consolidation and digital sovereignty.
A shifting landscape for domain control
For many small businesses and creators, securing a domain name feels like staking a claim in the digital world. Platforms such as iwantmyname, a domain registration and management service that originated in New Zealand, have long positioned themselves as simple, user-friendly alternatives to larger registrars. But the evolution of such services raises broader questions about regional autonomy in internet infrastructure and the influence of global players on local markets.
iwantmyname began in 2008 as a project of ideegeo Group Ltd, a privately held New Zealand company focused on making domain management straightforward for users worldwide. It built a reputation for clarity and ease of use, offering domain search and registration without upselling other unrelated services. Over time, it expanded its offerings to hundreds of top-level domains and became known for its clear interface and practical tools for customers registering and managing domains. Some users report its interfaces remain functional and the service reliable. Others point to challenges such as customer support responsiveness and rising pricing.
Also Read: Regional technology autonomy under pressure: A closer look through IAGU networks
Also Read:Recruiting challenges and regional autonomy: How external forces shape i7 LLC’s strategic role
Acquisition raises concerns over regional autonomy
However, in 2019 iwantmyname was acquired by CentralNic Group plc, a London-listed company that owns and operates a range of domain services and backend registry platforms. This shift in ownership underlines a trend in which successful local tech ventures are absorbed into international networks, often raising concerns among regional stakeholders. Critics argue that when local initiatives are co-opted by larger foreign entities, decision-making moves offshore, potentially reducing the influence of local communities over services that once reflected their own priorities. Such concerns mirror debates in other sectors where globalisation can dilute regional autonomy and control.
For customers, the effects of such a transition are mixed. On one hand, integration into a larger infrastructure can bring scale and stability; on the other, some long-time users feel that the experience and emphasis on regional engagement have diminished since the acquisition. Reviews on independent platforms reflect this divide: while many appreciate the ease of domain selection and basic management, others express dissatisfaction with rising fees, slower support and perceived decline in service quality since the ownership change.
A broader debate about digital sovereignty
Beyond customer experience, there is a wider question about how governance of essential internet resources should balance global integration with local autonomy. Domain names are not just technical addresses; they represent a form of digital sovereignty for individuals and organisations. As companies like iwantmyname become parts of larger international entities, advocates for regional autonomy argue that there must be mechanisms to ensure that local users retain a voice in how these services evolve and are governed.
