- The Unitree G1 humanoid robot offers improved agility and skills compared to its predecessor, the H1, but lacks a face and hands.
- Despite its advanced capabilities, the G1 is not designed for home use and requires safety precautions during operation.
OUR TAKE
The Unitree G1 presents an exciting leap in humanoid robotics, showcasing impressive agility and learning abilities. However, while it is fascinating that users can own such technology, the high price tag and safety concerns may deter potential buyers. As advancements continue, we may soon see more affordable, user-friendly robots for everyday applications.
–Lily,Yang, BTW reporter
What happened
Unitree has unveiled the G1 humanoid robot, priced at $16,000, which boasts greater speed and flexibility than its predecessor, the H1, observed earlier at CES 2024. The G1 performs various tasks, including walking, running, climbing stairs, and even engaging in martial arts movements. Weighing 77 pounds and standing 4 feet tall, it can fold into a compact size.
Although equipped with LiDAR scanners, it does not have a face or built-in hands—optional three-fingered dextrous hands are available for purchase, capable of tasks like cracking walnuts or soldering. While the G1 showcases innovative features, it is not meant for home environments. The developers emphasise safety measures when using the robot.
The announcement suggests that certain abilities are still being developed, raising questions about what customers receive for their investment. Looking ahead, future iterations may become cheaper and more capable by 2025.
Also read: WeRide’s robotaxi tests get California thumbs up
Also read: AES launches a robot for the installation of solar panels
Why it’s important
The launch of Unitree G1 represents a significant advance in humanoid robotics and highlights the growing interest and capabilities in this field. With its flexible design and impressive skills, the G1 sets a new benchmark for robotic companions.
However, the $16,000 price tag may limit its use for hobbyists and researchers. In addition, the lack of built-in safety features has raised questions about its practical application in the home environment, especially around children. While marketing emphasises caution, it also emphasises the complexities involved in integrating such a powerful technology into everyday life. The absence of certain features, such as the self-charging function and the need to purchase additional dexterous hands, reduces its overall value proposition.
On the positive side, continuous improvements suggest that future versions could offer better usability and affordability, paving the way for wider adoption of humanoid robots in a variety of applications.
