Close Menu
  • Home
  • Leadership Alliance
  • Exclusives
  • History of the Internet
  • AFRINIC News
  • Internet Governance
    • Regulations
    • Governance Bodies
    • Emerging Tech
  • Others
    • IT Infrastructure
      • Networking
      • Cloud
      • Data Centres
    • Company Stories
      • Profile
      • Startups
      • Tech Titans
      • Partner Content
    • Fintech
      • Blockchain
      • Payments
      • Regulations
    • Tech Trends
      • AI
      • AR / VR
      • IoT
    • Video / Podcast
  • Country News
    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • North America
    • Lat Am/Caribbean
    • Europe/Middle East
Facebook LinkedIn YouTube Instagram X (Twitter)
Blue Tech Wave Media
Facebook LinkedIn YouTube Instagram X (Twitter)
  • Home
  • Leadership Alliance
  • Exclusives
  • History of the Internet
  • AFRINIC News
  • Internet Governance
    • Regulation
    • Governance Bodies
    • Emerging Tech
  • Others
    • IT Infrastructure
      • Networking
      • Cloud
      • Data Centres
    • Company Stories
      • Profiles
      • Startups
      • Tech Titans
      • Partner Content
    • Fintech
      • Blockchain
      • Payments
      • Regulation
    • Tech Trends
      • AI
      • AR/VR
      • IoT
    • Video / Podcast
  • Africa
  • Asia-Pacific
  • North America
  • Lat Am/Caribbean
  • Europe/Middle East
Blue Tech Wave Media
Home » California’s Gavin Newsom vetoes controversial AI safety bill
0930-Gavin Newsom
0930-Gavin Newsom
AI

California’s Gavin Newsom vetoes controversial AI safety bill

By Rebecca XuOctober 4, 2024No Comments2 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • Gov. Newsom’s veto of SB 1047 highlights the ongoing debate over AI regulation.
  • The decision underscores the need for a balanced approach to AI safety, avoiding over-regulation.

OUR TAKE
The veto reflects the ongoing tension between the desire to regulate emerging technologies and the need to encourage innovation. While the bill’s failure to pass may slow the progression of AI safety regulations in California, the conversation around the need for responsible AI development is likely to continue. Both supporters and opponents of the bill agree on the importance of addressing AI risks, suggesting that the debate over the best approach to regulation is far from over.

–Rebecca Xu, BTW reporter

What happened

California Governor Gavin Newsom has vetoed SB 1047, a comprehensive artificial intelligence safety bill. He argued that the legislation, while well-intentioned, would primarily target large companies and overlook critical factors such as the deployment context of AI systems. Newsom highlighted that 32 of the top 50 AI firms are based in California, suggesting that the bill’s stringent standards could stifle innovation without adequately addressing safety concerns. He pointed out that the bill failed to differentiate between high-risk and low-risk AI applications, potentially undermining its intended safety benefits.

Newsom has previously signed other AI-related bills aimed at regulating performance replicas and addressing misinformation, indicating a commitment to responsible AI governance.

Also read: California passes new laws to protect performers from AI misuse

Also read: California approves legislation to tighten AI regulation

Why it’s important

The veto is a significant setback for those advocating for greater oversight and regulation of AI development. It means that, for now, there will be no stringent state-level regulation mandating safety testing and public disclosure of safety protocols for AI models in California. Critics of the bill, including Governor Newsom, argued that it did not differentiate between AI systems deployed in high-risk environments and those that were not, applying stringent standards even to basic functions if deployed by a large system.

The debate around SB 1047 has brought the issue of AI safety to the forefront, highlighting the need for a balanced approach that fosters innovation while addressing potential risks. Governor Newsom has announced plans to work with industry experts to develop more workable guardrails around AI models, focusing on analysing their capabilities and risks.

AI AI safety bill California
Rebecca Xu

Rebecca Xu is an intern reporter at Blue Tech Wave specialising in tech trends. She graduated from Changshu Institute of Technology. Send tips to r.xu@btw.media.

Related Posts

Africa faces unresolved governance challenges before any CAIGA model can take shape

December 5, 2025

Switzerland’s railways shift to VoLTE as 3G shutdown looms

December 5, 2025

BT unveils ‘sovereign’ data platform to bolster UK’s data security and AI readiness

December 5, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

CATEGORIES
Archives
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023

Blue Tech Wave (BTW.Media) is a future-facing tech media brand delivering sharp insights, trendspotting, and bold storytelling across digital, social, and video. We translate complexity into clarity—so you’re always ahead of the curve.

BTW
  • About BTW
  • Contact Us
  • Join Our Team
  • About AFRINIC
  • History of the Internet
TERMS
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms of Use
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
BTW.MEDIA is proudly owned by LARUS Ltd.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.