AFRINIC’s disputed elections are more than a governance issue—they shape the policies that decide Africa’s digital future. Without transparent, accountable processes, critical decisions on IP resource allocation and connectivity risk being captured by elites instead of the community.
Browsing: Afrinic
The governance crisis at AFRINIC is directly impacting IP resource management in Africa, with implications for IPv4 and IPv6 allocation.
AFRINIC’s policy process suffers as election legitimacy fails; procedural reform is essential for progress.
AFRINIC must follow law, recognise June election, and resist government interference to regain African community trust.
AFRINIC election disputes put African ISPs and startups at risk. Delays in IP allocation, weak trust, and unstable governance.
AFRINIC’s election legitimacy raise concerns about transparency in internet governance, with implications for Africa and global trust.
AFRINIC’s June and September 2025 election failures highlight the urgent need for stronger constitutional safeguards.
Mauritius’ AFRINIC election annulment shows how weak legal safeguards invite state capture and foreign interference.
Mauritius’ legal uncertainty endangers AFRINIC elections; judicial independence needed to restore community-led governance.
AFRINIC’s election rules, shaped by Mauritius’ constitution, spark repeated disputes and question governance legitimacy.
The annulment of June’s lawful vote over one proxy dispute exposes inconsistencies in Mauritius’ judicial oversight.
AFRINIC’s broken election system has left members facing annulled votes, court disputes, and collapsing trust. In contrast, other Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) enforce transparency, independent oversight, and strict bylaw compliance. Cloud Innovation argues Africa must learn from these global models to restore accountability and safeguard its digital future.