Close Menu
  • Home
  • Leadership Alliance
  • Exclusives
  • History of the Internet
  • AFRINIC News
  • Internet Governance
    • Regulations
    • Governance Bodies
    • Emerging Tech
  • Others
    • IT Infrastructure
      • Networking
      • Cloud
      • Data Centres
    • Company Stories
      • Profile
      • Startups
      • Tech Titans
      • Partner Content
    • Fintech
      • Blockchain
      • Payments
      • Regulations
    • Tech Trends
      • AI
      • AR / VR
      • IoT
    • Video / Podcast
  • Country News
    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • North America
    • Lat Am/Caribbean
    • Europe/Middle East
Facebook LinkedIn YouTube Instagram X (Twitter)
Blue Tech Wave Media
Facebook LinkedIn YouTube Instagram X (Twitter)
  • Home
  • Leadership Alliance
  • Exclusives
  • History of the Internet
  • AFRINIC News
  • Internet Governance
    • Regulation
    • Governance Bodies
    • Emerging Tech
  • Others
    • IT Infrastructure
      • Networking
      • Cloud
      • Data Centres
    • Company Stories
      • Profiles
      • Startups
      • Tech Titans
      • Partner Content
    • Fintech
      • Blockchain
      • Payments
      • Regulation
    • Tech Trends
      • AI
      • AR/VR
      • IoT
    • Video / Podcast
  • Africa
  • Asia-Pacific
  • North America
  • Lat Am/Caribbean
  • Europe/Middle East
Blue Tech Wave Media
Home » IETF 122 post-meeting survey reveals mixed feedback
IETF 122
IETF 122
Internet Governance

IETF 122 post-meeting survey reveals mixed feedback

By Juno chenApril 22, 2025No Comments2 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • Overall satisfaction for IETF 122 stands at 4.49 out of 5, but there are notable concerns about specific sessions.
  • The survey results are available through an interactive dashboard, revealing detailed feedback from participants.

What happened: IETF 122 survey highlights areas of discontent and room for improvement

IETF 122 took place from 15 to 21 March 2025 in Bangkok, with a mix of 752 onsite and 549 remote participants. A post-meeting survey was conducted with 244 responses — 196 from onsite and 48 from remote attendees. The results, published on 17 April 2025, show an overall satisfaction score of 4.49 out of 5, but also indicate areas where participants were less content.

Survey responses pointed out that sessions such as the Hackathon received relatively high ratings, but other parts of the event, like side meetings and plenary sessions, were not as well-received, scoring 3.93. This suggests that while some aspects of the event were deemed acceptable, there were significant shortcomings. Feedback from participants led to changes such as revising the side meeting booking process and increasing rented furniture to address seating issues.

Additionally, dietary options were reviewed based on attendee input, but questions remain about how effectively these adjustments will meet diverse needs in the future. Signage was also improved to assist navigation around the venue, indicating logistical challenges faced by some attendees.

Also read: IETF 122 discusses Key DNS enhancements
Also read:
Cisco bolsters IETF support with $1.3M equipment donation

Why it’s important

While the IETF’s survey reflects a relatively high overall satisfaction, the results also underscore areas where significant improvements are needed. The low ratings for specific sessions such as side meetings raise concerns about the quality and organisation of parts of the event. These aspects will need to be addressed more thoroughly in future meetings, as the ongoing adjustments may not be enough to resolve all attendee concerns. The ability of IETF to enact meaningful changes based on participant feedback will be crucial in determining whether these meetings remain relevant for the broader community.

IETF 122 IETF Hackathon IETF logistics IETF sessions IETF side meetings meeting improvement participant feedback post-meeting survey
Juno chen

Juno Chen is an intern reporter at BTW Media. Having studied Media and Data Analytics at the University of Sydney. She specialised in industry insights Contact her at j.chen@btw.media.

Related Posts

CAIGA and digital sovereignty: What it means for African countries

November 27, 2025

Why Africa’s internet community is concerned about CAIGA

November 26, 2025

CAIGA vs traditional internet governance models in Africa

November 25, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

CATEGORIES
Archives
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023

Blue Tech Wave (BTW.Media) is a future-facing tech media brand delivering sharp insights, trendspotting, and bold storytelling across digital, social, and video. We translate complexity into clarity—so you’re always ahead of the curve.

BTW
  • About BTW
  • Contact Us
  • Join Our Team
  • About AFRINIC
  • History of the Internet
TERMS
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms of Use
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
BTW.MEDIA is proudly owned by LARUS Ltd.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.