Close Menu
    Facebook LinkedIn YouTube Instagram X (Twitter)
    Blue Tech Wave Media
    Facebook LinkedIn YouTube Instagram X (Twitter)
    • Home
    • Leadership Alliance
    • Exclusives
    • Internet Governance
      • Regulation
      • Governance Bodies
      • Emerging Tech
    • IT Infrastructure
      • Networking
      • Cloud
      • Data Centres
    • Company Stories
      • Profiles
      • Startups
      • Tech Titans
      • Partner Content
    • Others
      • Fintech
        • Blockchain
        • Payments
        • Regulation
      • Tech Trends
        • AI
        • AR/VR
        • IoT
      • Video / Podcast
    Blue Tech Wave Media
    Home » AFRINIC 2025 election in crisis: Why transparency is missing
    afrinic-licann
    afrinic-licann
    AFRINIC

    AFRINIC 2025 election in crisis: Why transparency is missing

    By Jocelyn FangJuly 7, 2025Updated:July 10, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
    • AFRINIC leadership accused of lacking transparency in suspending and annulling the election without due process
    • Critics say one disputed proxy vote should not invalidate hundreds of legitimate member votes

    What happened: AFRINIC’s 2025 election transparency failures

    The origin of the AFRINIC election crisis in Mauritius last week, stems from a serious breach of confidentiality by a member of the AFRINIC Election Committee. The individual is alleged to have removed Power of Attorney (POA) documents from the voting room and contacted resource holders directly — actions that violate established confidentiality and non-disclosure obligations.

    Lack of transparency is the real crisis: Legitimate votes are invalidated across the board

    However, critics argue that even if certain POAs were improperly submitted, it remains deeply questionable whether such irregularities justified the invalidation of hundreds of legitimate votes, or the cancellation of the entire election. AFRINIC did not conduct a vote-by-vote verification process, nor did it launch a transparent appeals or audit mechanism. Instead, it chose to halt the entire process outright.

    To many observers, this disproportionate response raised even more serious concerns:

    • Was AFRINIC acting under external pressure to stop the vote?
    • Or was the crisis strategically exploited to influence the election outcome or reshape the board’s composition?

    The real question isn’t whether that POA was valid, but whether it was simply used as a convenient cover — a surface-level justification to obscure deeper political motives.If an unverified proxy vote can lead to the annulment of an entire election — without a clear explanation or path to remedy — then the issue goes far beyond procedural compliance. It speaks to whether AFRINIC’s governance framework has lost its independence, transparency, and credibility.

    Also read: As ICANN threatens to ‘review’ AFRINIC, an elected board is its only hope for survival
    Also read: The story of AFRINIC: How Africa’s internet ideal was destroyed from within

    Why it matters

    When transparency fails, trust follows

    The internet is a shared global resource. Failures in regional governance don’t remain regional for long. As part of the global IP allocation system, AFRINIC is interconnected with bodies like ICANN, the NRO, and the IETF. Its actions — or failures — affect the stability and fairness of the entire ecosystem. Cancelling an election without clear justification erodes the trust that binds the multi-stakeholder internet model together.

    AFRINIC’s 2025 election was not simply about who sits on the board. It was a test of whether the institution is governed by principles or discretion, by community accountability or institutional opacity. If AFRINIC is to recover its standing — both in Africa and globally — it must immediately commit to transparent, fair, and procedurally sound governance. Anything less puts not just internal cohesion at risk, but Africa’s rightful role in shaping the digital future of the continent.

    Global consequences of local failures

    The internet is a global commons. AFRINIC’s struggles serve as a cautionary tale: transparency is not optional — it is foundational. AFRINIC’s 2025 election built on community trust and global coordination, the stakes are too high to ignore. If AFRINIC is to regain credibility, it must urgently commit to transparent, accountable, and participatory governance. Otherwise, it risks not only internal fragmentation, but also losing its voice in shaping Africa’s digital future.

    Afrinic AFRINIC election internet governance proxy voting
    Jocelyn Fang

    Jocelyn is a community engagement specialist at BTW Media, having studied investment Management at Bayes business school . Contact her at j.fang@btw.media.

    Related Posts

    AFRINIC governance crisis sparks calls for complete overhaul

    July 29, 2025

    Impact of such disputes on AFRINIC’s member community

    July 29, 2025

    The future of AFRINIC: Rebuilding trust after controversy

    July 29, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    CATEGORIES
    Archives
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023

    Blue Tech Wave (BTW.Media) is a future-facing tech media brand delivering sharp insights, trendspotting, and bold storytelling across digital, social, and video. We translate complexity into clarity—so you’re always ahead of the curve.

    BTW
    • About BTW
    • Contact Us
    • Join Our Team
    TERMS
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Use
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.