- Digital banking startup Mercury has announced it will cease servicing customers in several countries, including Ukraine and Nigeria, as part of a policy shift aimed at enhancing compliance and risk management.
- Mercury’s abrupt policy change reflects broader trends and challenges in the digital banking and regulatory landscape.
OUR TAKE
Mercury’s move to cut ties with Ukraine amidst their risk-tightening spree feels a bit off-key. It’s not like Ukraine’s been on any sanctions list, and their startup scene’s been buzzing. Reminds me of when PayPal famously froze accounts of foreign freelancers, citing similar compliance reasons. It feels like a blanket policy that might be overshooting the target. Plus, isolating talented entrepreneurs like Alyona Mysko, who’s just trying to build her business, seems counterproductive. Hopefully, Mercury reconsiders and finds a more nuanced approach to balancing risk and growth opportunities.
–Miurio huang, BTW reporter
What happened
Digital banking startup Mercury has announced it will cease servicing customers in several countries, including Ukraine and Nigeria, as part of a policy shift aimed at enhancing compliance and risk management. This decision follows recent scrutiny from federal regulators concerning the practices of one of Mercury’s partners, Choice Bank.
Earlier this year, Mercury faced federal scrutiny due to concerns about Choice Bank’s handling of accounts for foreign companies. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) expressed worries about the legality and risk associated with accounts opened in “legally risky countries.” Reports indicated that Choice Bank had allowed Mercury to open numerous accounts using questionable methods for proving a U.S. presence.
In response to these concerns, Mercury informed the TechCrush that it was strengthening its risk and compliance teams. The company has now implemented updated eligibility requirements, leading to the termination of services for customers in certain regions. Mercury stated that it could no longer support these customers due to the addresses they provided or frequent account activity from specific locations.
While the decision to cut off services to countries like North Korea, Iran, Libya, and Russia aligns with expectations, the inclusion of Ukraine on this list is notable. Ukraine has been recognised for its vibrant and growing startup community, particularly before the Russian invasion. Mercury clarified that its policy change affects only founders residing in Ukraine and not those with Ukrainian passports living in the U.S. This adjustment has drawn criticism from Ukrainian entrepreneurs, including Alyona Mysko, CEO and founder of Fuelfinance, who highlighted the impact on her business due to her Ukrainian passport.
Mercury confirmed that it continues to support Ukrainian founders based in the U.S. but has decided to discontinue support for companies with founders located in Ukraine.
Also read: Spanish banks bow to pressure: 11% pay rise after March strikes
Also read: Toyota plans $5.2B share buyback from banks, insurers
Why it’s important
Mercury’s abrupt policy change reflects broader trends and challenges in the digital banking and regulatory landscape. The company’s decision to halt services in certain countries underscores the increasing scrutiny and regulatory pressure facing financial institutions, particularly those dealing with international clients. The move highlights the tension between maintaining robust compliance standards and supporting global entrepreneurial communities.
The scrutiny from the FDIC and the subsequent policy change illustrate the complexities of operating in a global financial environment. For startups, particularly those in regions with growing tech ecosystems like Ukraine, losing access to banking services can significantly impact their operations and growth prospects. This is especially critical for countries like Ukraine, where the tech sector has been a bright spot amid geopolitical tensions.
Mercury’s decision also signals a shift towards more stringent risk management practices in the digital banking sector. By tightening its eligibility requirements and focusing on compliance, Mercury aims to mitigate potential legal and financial risks. However, this approach also raises questions about the accessibility of banking services for startups in emerging markets.
For investors and entrepreneurs, Mercury’s move serves as a reminder of the importance of understanding regulatory environments and the potential risks associated with international operations. The company’s response to federal scrutiny, while aimed at safeguarding its operations, also highlights the challenges faced by startups in navigating complex regulatory landscapes.
Mercury’s decision to cut off services in certain countries reflects the growing emphasis on compliance and risk management in the digital banking sector. While the move addresses regulatory concerns, it also impacts startups in affected regions, particularly in Ukraine, where the tech community has been expanding despite ongoing challenges. As financial institutions continue to adapt to regulatory pressures, the accessibility and support for international entrepreneurs remain crucial considerations.
