Saltar al contenido principal

AFRINIC · Vigilancia de RIR

AFPUB-2018-GEN-001-DRAFT07

Consulta aquí el historial de cada propuesta: qué cambió, por qué fue relevante, quién defendió cada postura, cómo evolucionaron las posiciones, qué se decidió y dónde persisten las lagunas en la evidencia.

Hechos con fuentes

ID de política
AFPUB-2018-GEN-001-DRAFT07
RIR
AFRINIC
Estado oficial
Ratified
Estado normalizado
Aceptada
Presentada
17 may 2021
Última actualización de fuentes
9 oct 2026
Cobertura
Parcial

¿Quiénes marcaron realmente el debate?

1Participantes totales
DesconocidaParticipantes del debate
1Actores formales
DesconocidaMensajes de discusión
DesconocidaParticipantes efectivos
DesconocidaCuota de los cinco principales
DesconocidaPersonas que cubren el 50 %
DesconocidaPersonas que cubren el 80 %

Evolución de la política

1
En debate · Under Discussion
12 ago 2018
Hechos con fuentes ↗

source representation · The retained source changes from a title-only Draft 1 capture to the full Draft 1 proposal and staff assessment. The comparison establishes added source detail, not a policy amendment between two policy texts.

2
En debate · Under Discussion
20 nov 2018
Hechos con fuentes ↗

source representation · The retained source changes from a title-only Draft 2 capture to a full proposal page containing the draft text, revision history and staff assessment. The newly available detail should be treated as source enrichment rather than an inferred policy change.

3
Desconocida · Archived
5 jun 2019
Hechos con fuentes ↗

Coverage of directly assigned resources · Draft 3 explicitly applies the mandatory abuse-c contact to resources allocated or assigned by AFRINIC; Draft 2's operative wording referred to allocated resources. This clarifies the text's coverage of direct assignments rather than establishing that the proposal had already been implemented.

Response to failed abuse-contact validation · Draft 2 prescribed initial account blocking, except for contact updates, and release of the block after revalidation. Draft 3 replaces that fixed sequence with further follow-up, warnings and blocking of certain services at AFRINIC's discretion under the relevant policies and procedures. The new wording does not identify which services must be blocked.

Escalation mechanism in section 8.6 · Draft 3 retains escalation for fraudulent validation or inadequate abuse responses, but states the operative requirement as a method enabling revalidation. Draft 2 placed an example mailbox and possible AFRINIC intermediation or resource-revocation procedures in section 8.6 itself; Draft 3 moves implementation examples and those further actions to the additional-information procedure. This is a change in how the requirement is specified, not evidence that escalation ceased to exist.

Time limits in the illustrative validation procedure · The worked example in Draft 3 extends validation-code validity from two working days to 15 working days and the subsequent correction period from three business days to 15 business days. These changes belong to the example procedure; the section 8.4 objectives already specified initial and escalation periods of no more than 15 days in both drafts.

Automation and human validation · Draft 3 changes the validation objective from avoiding automated processing to avoiding exclusively automated processing. The distinction allows automation alongside the retained requirement for a person to understand the procedure and monitor the abuse mailbox.

IRT and abuse-c publication wording · Draft 3 describes the IRT publication relationship explicitly as an alias to abuse-c, where Draft 2 said the IRT would also be published as abuse-c. Both retain the aim of finding the same contact information through either name and preserving the remaining IRT information; neither passage demonstrates that the migration had occurred.

Ticket continuity in abuse correspondence · Draft 3 adds that a generated ticket number should be retained, typically in the subject, through successive communications. Draft 2 already described automatic reporting and optional initial ticket assignment but did not include this explicit continuity instruction in the corresponding passage.

Warnings in the illustrative follow-up procedure · Draft 3 adds explicit multi-channel warnings to the resource holder, including other mailboxes and alert pop-ups, with the policy text and consequences of continued non-compliance. It also says that blocking access to certain services should be considered in the example procedure. Draft 2 proceeded from its short correction window to repeated validation without this warning paragraph.

5
Desconocida · Archived
22 nov 2019
Hechos con fuentes ↗

Contact data model · Draft 5 clarifies that abuse-c is a mandatory attribute pointing to a person or role, with at least one monitored abuse mailbox. Draft 4 described a mandatory object and a contact in the corresponding WHOIS entry. This makes the reference structure more explicit; it does not create evidence of a completed WHOIS migration.

Contacts used when validation fails · The escalation recipient changes from other LIR contacts to other member contacts, and the surrounding implementation discussion similarly refers to members. The new wording is less tied to the LIR class. Both versions keep the second validation period at no more than 15 days; the text does not establish how many members were affected in practice.

Express enforcement sentence · The draft-4 sentence prescribing follow-up, warnings and discretionary service blocking after non-compliance is absent from draft 5's proposed section 8.5. The validation frequency and escalation-to-AFRINIC mechanism remain. The newer rationale expressly invokes database-accuracy obligations under the RSA, so this omission must not be treated as a waiver of separate RSA enforcement or proof that sanctions were abolished.

IRT transition and operational discretion · The earlier additional information promised an IRT alias or pointer to abuse-c. The newer draft says that, if consensus is reached, mnt-IRT must be renamed to abuse-c; AFRINIC chooses whether and how long to retain an alias and the IRT data, and how to update the guidelines. This replaces a specific transitional arrangement with more operational discretion, conditional on the proposal's approval.

6
Desconocida · Archived
5 ago 2020
Hechos con fuentes ↗

Validation wording and escalation contacts · Draft 6 changes confirmation that the resource holder understands the policy into confirmation that the holder has read it, with separate monitoring, action and response bullets. It also changes other member contacts back to other LIR contacts. Although its history calls the revision editorial improvements, those are observable wording differences; the latter should not be silently treated as identical coverage of all member categories.

New staff assessment and implementation constraints · The new page adds a dated staff assessment describing WHOIS, MyAFRINIC and registration-process changes, the initial compliance workload and potential staffing needs. It says the proposal's 90-day expectation cannot be met, estimates six months for systems work and twelve months for member compliance, and requests clarification about legacy resources. These are staff estimates and unresolved scope questions, not evidence of implementation or an amendment that automatically imposes those timelines.

Historical references and date uncertainty · The references now describe LACNIC as having accepted an equivalent proposal that was under implementation, and describe discussion in RIPE. These are the source's historical comparisons, not verified present-day implementation status. Draft 5's own history dates it to 22 November 2019, while draft 6's retrospective history says 21 November; that disagreement remains visible. Draft 6's dated assessment and later typo correction are separate from its 5 August 2020 draft date.

7
Aceptada · Ratified
17 may 2021
Hechos con fuentes ↗

New operative slow-start provision · Draft 7 adds proposed section 8.7, expressly allowing yearly adjustment of initial and escalation periods and validation frequency in light of staffing, procedures and actual data, with reasons communicated to the community. Draft 6 discussed adjustable periods in Additional information but lacked this separate operative section. The change gives the gradual rollout an explicit policy basis; it is not proof that any particular extension was exercised.

Legacy resources, abuse definitions and enforcement boundaries · The new explanatory text says the proposal sets no different conditions for legacy holders, leaves non-compliance consequences to the RSA and leaves the definition of abuse and escalation beyond contact validation to participants and their local rules. It also asserts no additional GDPR impact. The earlier staff assessment expressly requested guidance on legacy applicability; the newer assessment lists no clarification requests. These statements clarify the author's intended scope and the assessment's position, but are not an independent legal determination or proof that every legacy resource was brought into compliance.

Rollout timing and financial assessment · The newer additional information illustrates an initial pass lasting 12–24 months and explicitly leaves implementation timing to AFRINIC's operations, priorities and staffing. Its revised staff assessment records no financial impact and a phased rollout, replacing the earlier assessment's extra-staff requirement and six-month systems/twelve-month compliance estimates. These remain proposal explanations and staff planning statements; they do not establish actual completion dates or a measured absence of cost.

Publication and adoption context · The newer retained page identifies DRAFT07, gives 17 May 2021 and labels the proposal Ratified, whereas the earlier retained page is an archived draft-6 page with a conflicting DRAFT01 header. The comparison follows the source-specific draft sequence. The Ratified label is evidence of the later page's stated status; it does not itself date a Board decision to the submission date or prove technical implementation.

8
Desconocida · Archived
15 may 2022
Hechos con fuentes ↗

Renewal of proposal validity · Draft 8's revision history explicitly describes a version update without policy changes to extend validity for Board ratification, with reference information updated. The retained operative provisions, including the yearly-adjustable slow-start rule, remain substantively the same as draft 7; punctuation and explanatory wording differ. This is evidence of the stated purpose of the renewal, not proof that the Board ratified the proposal or that deployment occurred on 15 May 2022.

Availability of the staff assessment · The draft-7 page carries a full staff assessment, including operational effects and phased implementation. The retained draft-8 page ends with Staff Assessment (In Progress). That changes the evidence available on this page; it does not prove that the prior assessment was repudiated or that previously described systems obligations were removed. The earlier assessment remains retained separately.

Conflicting migrated metadata and status labels · The newer page title says Draft 8 and its history dates that version to 15 May 2022, yet its header reuses DRAFT01 and a 5 August 2020 submission date and labels the page Archived. The older draft-7 page says Ratified. These are conflicting retained page metadata and capture contexts, not evidence that ratification was reversed. The derived sequence uses the explicit draft-8 title and history while preserving both source snapshots and their status differences.

Cronología del debate

  1. Versión oficial

    1

    Hechos con fuentes ↗
  2. Versión oficial

    2

    Hechos con fuentes ↗
  3. Versión oficial

    1

    En debate · Under Discussion

    Hechos con fuentes ↗
  4. Versión oficial

    2

    En debate · Under Discussion

    Hechos con fuentes ↗
  5. Versión oficial

    3

    Desconocida · Archived

    Hechos con fuentes ↗
  6. Versión oficial

    DRAFT03

    Desconocida · Archived

    Hechos con fuentes ↗
  7. Versión oficial

    4

    Desconocida · Archived

    Hechos con fuentes ↗
  8. Versión oficial

    DRAFT01

    Desconocida · Archived

    Hechos con fuentes ↗
  9. Versión oficial

    DRAFT01

    Desconocida · Archived

    Hechos con fuentes ↗
  10. Versión oficial

    5

    Desconocida · Archived

    Hechos con fuentes ↗
  11. Versión oficial

    DRAFT01

    Desconocida · Archived

    Hechos con fuentes ↗
  12. Versión oficial

    DRAFT01

    Desconocida · Archived

    Hechos con fuentes ↗
  13. Versión oficial

    6

    Desconocida · Archived

    Hechos con fuentes ↗
  14. Decisión oficial

    accepted

    accepted

    Hechos con fuentes ↗
  15. Presentación

    Presentación

    Hechos con fuentes ↗
  16. Versión oficial

    7

    Aceptada · Ratified

    Hechos con fuentes ↗
  17. Versión oficial

    8

    Desconocida · Archived

    Hechos con fuentes ↗

Entidades

Actualización: Desactualizada
  1. Mensajes de discusión0
    Primera actividadDesconocida
    Última actividadDesconocida
    Primera postura explícitaDesconocida
    Última postura explícitaDesconocida
    Cambios de postura0
    Coherencia del punto de vistaNo se expresa una postura explícita
    Otras políticas7

Fuentes y cobertura

Archivos de debates públicos

  • afrinic-rpd
    Primera captura
    4 ago 2004
    Última captura
    25 ago 2026
    Última actualización
    10 oct 2026
    Cobertura
    La cobertura de la fuente está incompleta.
    Cargando
    13.116
    Vacíos conocidos
    0
  • www.afrinic.net
  • afrinic-africann
    Primera captura
    3 ago 2026
    Última captura
    2 oct 2026
    Última actualización
    10 oct 2026
    Cobertura
    La cobertura de la fuente está incompleta.
    Cargando
    2520
    Vacíos conocidos
    0
  • afrinic-afripv6-discuss
    Primera captura
    17 ago 2015
    Última captura
    18 sept 2026
    Última actualización
    9 oct 2026
    Cobertura
    La cobertura de la fuente está incompleta.
    Cargando
    2538
    Vacíos conocidos
    0
  • afrinic-announce
    Primera captura
    18 ago 2015
    Última captura
    18 sept 2026
    Última actualización
    9 oct 2026
    Cobertura
    La cobertura de la fuente está incompleta.
    Cargando
    2497
    Vacíos conocidos
    0
  • afrinic-community-discuss
    Primera captura
    11 sept 2015
    Última captura
    29 dic 2019
    Última actualización
    9 oct 2026
    Cobertura
    La cobertura de la fuente está incompleta.
    Cargando
    3127
    Vacíos conocidos
    0
  • afrinic-dbwg
    Primera captura
    4 ago 2026
    Última captura
    6 oct 2026
    Última actualización
    10 oct 2026
    Cobertura
    La cobertura de la fuente está incompleta.
    Cargando
    871
    Vacíos conocidos
    0
  • afrinic-dnssec-ops
    Primera captura
    18 ago 2015
    Última captura
    1 dic 2016
    Última actualización
    9 oct 2026
    Cobertura
    La cobertura de la fuente está incompleta.
    Cargando
    307
    Vacíos conocidos
    0
  • afrinic-icp2-review
    Primera captura
    10 abr 2025
    Última captura
    10 nov 2025
    Última actualización
    9 oct 2026
    Cobertura
    La cobertura de la fuente está incompleta.
    Cargando
    0
    Vacíos conocidos
    0
  • afrinic-measurement-wg
    Primera captura
    1 feb 2018
    Última captura
    22 nov 2024
    Última actualización
    9 oct 2026
    Cobertura
    La cobertura de la fuente está incompleta.
    Cargando
    138
    Vacíos conocidos
    0
  • afrinic-mira
    Primera captura
    17 nov 2020
    Última captura
    22 nov 2024
    Última actualización
    9 oct 2026
    Cobertura
    La cobertura de la fuente está incompleta.
    Cargando
    0
    Vacíos conocidos
    0
  • afrinic-ois-wg
    Primera captura
    9 sept 2021
    Última captura
    22 nov 2024
    Última actualización
    9 oct 2026
    Cobertura
    La cobertura de la fuente está incompleta.
    Cargando
    0
    Vacíos conocidos
    0
  • afrinic-rpki-discuss
    Primera captura
    15 ene 2016
    Última captura
    23 abr 2026
    Última actualización
    9 oct 2026
    Cobertura
    La cobertura de la fuente está incompleta.
    Cargando
    154
    Vacíos conocidos
    0

Cobertura

Parcial
Primera captura: 4 ago 2004
Última captura: 10 oct 2026

Actualización

Actualización: Desactualizada · Última actualización:

Vacíos conocidos

  • www.afrinic.net: La cobertura de la fuente está incompleta. · Aún no se ha alcanzado el límite de la fuente.
  • www.afrinic.net: La cobertura de la fuente está incompleta. · Aún no se ha alcanzado el límite de la fuente.
  • afrinic-rpd: La cobertura de la fuente está incompleta. · Aún no se ha alcanzado el límite de la fuente.
  • www.afrinic.net: La cobertura de la fuente está incompleta. · Aún no se ha alcanzado el límite de la fuente.
  • afrinic-africann: La cobertura de la fuente está incompleta. · Aún no se ha alcanzado el límite de la fuente.
  • afrinic-afripv6-discuss: La cobertura de la fuente está incompleta. · Aún no se ha alcanzado el límite de la fuente.
  • afrinic-announce: La cobertura de la fuente está incompleta. · Aún no se ha alcanzado el límite de la fuente.
  • afrinic-community-discuss: La cobertura de la fuente está incompleta. · Aún no se ha alcanzado el límite de la fuente.
  • afrinic-dbwg: La cobertura de la fuente está incompleta. · Aún no se ha alcanzado el límite de la fuente.
  • afrinic-dnssec-ops: La cobertura de la fuente está incompleta. · Aún no se ha alcanzado el límite de la fuente.
  • afrinic-measurement-wg: La cobertura de la fuente está incompleta. · Aún no se ha alcanzado el límite de la fuente.
  • afrinic-rpki-discuss: La cobertura de la fuente está incompleta. · Aún no se ha alcanzado el límite de la fuente.