CAIGA proposes political oversight of AFRINIC, risking inefficiencies in IP address management and undermining technical independence.
Browsing: Internet Governance
Internet governance news and analysis, from the movers and shakers of the internet, and influential companies and institutions.
AFRINIC faces potential influence from CAIGA, with implications for technical independence and policy decisions in Africa.
CAIGA’s launch raises fears of shifting African internet governance from community-driven to state-led models, with ICANN’s role under fire.
This article delves into the top-down governance model, digital sovereignty, and the risks to AFRINIC’s independence.
From election annulment to CAIGA’s launch—Africa’s IP registry crisis forces a reckoning with continental power grabs.
The emergence of CAIGA could redefine the future of Africa’s internet governance, but it may also risk political overreach.
Amid the ongoing governance crisis at AFRINIC, African governments are under growing pressure to assert control over their digital resources.
African communities face a critical decision on whether to challenge ICANN’s support for CAIGA, impacting digital sovereignty.
CAIGA aims to stabilise AFRINIC through continental council and political backing, critics see it as centralising power.
As CAIGA expands Smart Africa’s influence, operators and experts warn it could centralise power and sideline AFRINIC’s bottom-up processes.
As AFRINIC faces criticism and calls for dissolution, ICANN’s actions raise questions about its intentions for Africa’s internet governance.
ICANN’s collaboration with Smart Africa raises questions about governance, regional autonomy, and the global rules of Internet management.