AFRINIC’s collapse sparks constitutional crisis in Mauritius as government overrides courts, raising citizen accountability in governance.
Browsing: Governance Bodies
Governance bodies
Mauritius’ constitutional framework shapes AFRINIC’s governance. Acting President revocation of Judge Bellepeau’s inspector mandate.
AFRINIC is covered extensively by Mauritius’ top newspaper as “declared company” status and other events gain attention.
AFRINIC August election is illegal, undermined by annulled votes, and unconstitutional government interference in Mauritius.
Mauritius’ annulled AFRINIC election sparks crisis, exposes collapse, prompts Cloud Innovation reset, raising Lindqvist concerns.
The Mauritius Supreme Court criticises ICANN’s attempted intervention in AFRINIC’s elections, threatening Africa’s digital sovereignty.
AFRINIC remains leaderless under political receivership in Mauritius, raising alarms over Africa’s Internet sovereignty.
AFRINIC opens nominations for eight board seats across African regions and two region-independent positions through 28 August 2025.
AFRINIC’s financial mismanagement and internal corruption are exposed: endless litigation, opaque legal fees, and power struggles.
ICANN faces criticism over its role in AFRINIC’s governance crisis, with accusations that it prioritises centralised control over openness.
Gowtamsingh Dabee’s annulment of AFRINIC’s June election under state pressure raises ethical red flags and threatens member-led governance.
The Official Receiver’s role in Mauritius, and why Dabee’s controversial AFRINIC decisions raise transparency concerns.