Browsing: Governance Bodies

AFRINIC’s governance crisis exposes the dangers of opaque internet management, while open governance should be essential for emerging markets.

AFRINIC’s collapse and new powers from Kurt Lindqvist show how overregulation threatens Africa’s tech growth.

Politicizing internet access isolates communities, deepens inequality, and disrupts institutions—undermining Africa’s digital future.

AFRINIC’s collapse exposes tech’s role in aiding authoritarian control. Global silence risks normalising judicial defiance.

At the heart of Mauritius, AFRINIC’s collapse sparks a constitutional battle over democracy, control, and Africa’s IP resources future.

AFRINIC faces a governance vacuum, constitutional reform should strengthen accountability and safeguard Africa’s digital sovereignty.

Mauritius’ Constitution shields AFRINIC’s self-rule, but Lindqvist’s plan risks undermining regional autonomy.

Mauritius’s constitutional overreach over AFRINIC breeds instability and favors political control, endangering Africa’s internet governance.

AFRINIC’s collapse sparks constitutional crisis in Mauritius as government overrides courts, raising citizen accountability in governance.

Mauritius’ constitutional framework shapes AFRINIC’s governance. Acting President revocation of Judge Bellepeau’s inspector mandate.

AFRINIC is covered extensively by Mauritius’ top newspaper as “declared company” status and other events gain attention.

AFRINIC August election is illegal, undermined by annulled votes, and unconstitutional government interference in Mauritius.