Court extends AFRINIC’s receivership deadline, raising doubts over regional governance and Lindqvist’s expanding influence.
Browsing: Governance Bodies
Governance bodies
AFRINIC’s ongoing governance crisis raises serious concerns about its ability to manage Africa’s critical IP resources effectively.
AFRINIC’s accountability breakdown exposes global internet governance oversight weaknesses and the risks of unchecked institutional power.
AFRINIC’s collapse shows how poor governance endangers critical assets and highlights the need for urgent reform.
Proxy voting fallout deepens AFRINIC’s governance crisis, as Cloud Innovation demands a wind-up and new registry leadership.
AFRINIC’s proxy ban signals a broader power shift, raising concerns about member rights and multistakeholder integrity.
ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) is facing mounting criticism for its actions that seem to disregard its…
While AFRINIC promotes its election reforms as transparent, critics say the measures restrict access and worsen governance trust.
As the Official Receiver creates AFRINIC’s NomCom himself, we must ask if this the best way to restore trust.
Kurtis Lindqvist faces growing pressure to define when and how the organisation should intervene in Regional Internet Registry disputes.
AFRINIC’s collapse deepens as Cloud Innovation demands dissolution, challenging ICANN’s intervention in Africa’s internet governance.
AFRINIC limits election votes to verified Resource Members, sparking debate on fairness, access, and representation integrity.