Close Menu
    Facebook LinkedIn YouTube Instagram X (Twitter)
    Blue Tech Wave Media
    Facebook LinkedIn YouTube Instagram X (Twitter)
    • Home
    • Leadership Alliance
    • Exclusives
    • Internet Governance
      • Regulation
      • Governance Bodies
      • Emerging Tech
    • IT Infrastructure
      • Networking
      • Cloud
      • Data Centres
    • Company Stories
      • Profiles
      • Startups
      • Tech Titans
      • Partner Content
    • Others
      • Fintech
        • Blockchain
        • Payments
        • Regulation
      • Tech Trends
        • AI
        • AR/VR
        • IoT
      • Video / Podcast
    Blue Tech Wave Media
    Home » Nuclear nightmares: The dark side of atomic energy
    Nuclear-power-plant-cooling-tower-in-Doel-Belgium
    Nuclear-power-plant-cooling-tower-in-Doel-Belgium
    IoT

    Nuclear nightmares: The dark side of atomic energy

    By Miurio HuangJune 21, 2024Updated:June 21, 2024No Comments3 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
    • In 1986, the Chernobyl disaster released massive amounts of radioactive particles into the atmosphere, leading to thousands of cancer cases and creating a 1,000-square-mile exclusion zone that’s still off-limits today.
    • Nuclear power plants generate tons of radioactive waste, and it’s not something about everyday trash. This stuff stays dangerous for thousands of years.

    When nuclear power plants fail, it’s like a nightmare. The 1986 Chernobyl disaster unleashed massive radioactive particles, leading to thousands of cancer cases and a 1,000-square-mile exclusion zone. Similarly, in 2011, Fukushima’s meltdowns due to an earthquake and tsunami caused severe radioactive contamination, highlighting the immense risks of nuclear energy.

    Catastrophic accidents

    In 1986, the Chernobyl disaster released massive amounts of radioactive particles into the atmosphere, leading to thousands of cancer cases and creating a 1,000-square-mile exclusion zone that’s still off-limits today.

    Fast forward to 2011, and the Fukushima disaster in Japan showed us that even in a highly developed country with advanced technology, things can spiral out of control. The earthquake and tsunami combo knocked out power and cooling systems, causing reactor meltdowns and massive radioactive contamination.

    When nuclear power plants go wrong, they go really wrong like Chernobyl, Fukushima. These weren’t minor oopsies; they were full-blown disasters that had long-lasting effects on human health and the environment. These accidents aren’t just historical footnotes, they’re haunting reminders of how high the stakes are when it comes to nuclear energy.

    Also read: Microsoft hires nuclear expert to fuel its data centres

    Also read: Hybrid quantum-classical computing simulates neutron scattering

    Radioactive waste

    Nuclear power plants generate tons of radioactive waste, and it’s not something about everyday trash. This stuff stays dangerous for thousands of years.

    Imagine having a garbage bin in your backyard that your post-generations will still have to deal with. That’s essentially what we’re doing with nuclear waste. There’s no foolproof way to dispose of it. Most of it gets stored in temporary facilities that weren’t designed for the long haul.

    Yucca Mountain in the U.S. was supposed to be a long-term storage site, but it’s been mired in political and scientific controversy.

    Transporting this waste is a risky business. One wrong move, and you could have a radioactive spill on a highway or in a populated area.

    High costs and economic risks

    Building and maintaining nuclear power plants is expensive, usually talking billions of dollars just to get one plant up and running.

    For example, the Hinkley Point C project in the UK is projected to cost over £22 billion ($29 billion). That’s a huge amount of money that could be invested in safer, more sustainable energy sources like wind or solar.

    And it’s not just about the initial costs; decommissioning old plants is also pricey and complex. Additionally, almost in every country, the one who foots the bill for cost overruns and delays is taxpayers. 

    Then there’s the issue of nuclear plants being sitting ducks for terrorist attacks or geopolitical conflicts. Imagine a cyber-attack that disables safety systems or a missile strike that targets a plant. The financial and human costs of such scenarios are almost unimaginable.

    Nuclear Energy nuclear power plants Yucca Mountain
    Miurio Huang

    Miurio Huang is an intern news reporter at Blue Tech Wave media specialised in AI. She graduated from Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University. Send tips to m.huang@btw.media.

    Related Posts

    Mpact group: Advances amid industry challenges

    September 5, 2025

    Sibanye-stillwater boosts recycling with $82 million metallix deal

    September 3, 2025

    Octopi Smart Solutions: Drives business innovation

    September 1, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    CATEGORIES
    Archives
    • September 2025
    • August 2025
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023

    Blue Tech Wave (BTW.Media) is a future-facing tech media brand delivering sharp insights, trendspotting, and bold storytelling across digital, social, and video. We translate complexity into clarity—so you’re always ahead of the curve.

    BTW
    • About BTW
    • Contact Us
    • Join Our Team
    TERMS
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Use
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.