- The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has initiated a trial against Meta, formerly known as Facebook, over its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp.
- The FTC alleges that Meta’s acquisitions were anti-competitive and aimed at suppressing competition in the social media market.
What happened: FTC takes Meta to court over Instagram and WhatsApp
The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has initiated a trial against Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, in Washington, DC. The FTC alleges that Meta’s acquisitions of Instagram for $1 billion in 2012 and WhatsApp for $22 billion in 2014 were illegal and aimed at maintaining a social media monopoly. These acquisitions are said to have stifled competition, harmed users, and negatively impacted advertisers.
The trial, expected to last up to 37 days, seeks to determine if Meta violated antitrust laws. A ruling in favour of the FTC could force Meta to divest Instagram and WhatsApp, significantly disrupting its business model. Such a decision could reshape the competitive landscape of social media, encouraging innovation and diversity in the market.
This case is important as it addresses broader concerns about competition in the tech industry. A successful outcome for the FTC could set a precedent for future antitrust actions against other large tech firms, potentially leading to stricter regulations on acquisitions. It highlights the ongoing debate about the role of big tech companies in the digital economy and the need for regulatory oversight to promote fair competition.
Also read: Apple defends Google’s search payment deals in antitrust case
Also read: China launches antitrust probe into Nvidia amid chip war escalation
Why it is important
The FTC’s case against Meta is crucial for addressing competition in the tech industry. By alleging that the acquisitions were anti-competitive, the FTC underscores the risks of monopolistic practices. If successful, this case could influence future antitrust actions and lead to stricter scrutiny of tech acquisitions.
The trial also reveals how large tech firms can limit competition through strategic purchases. Meta’s dominance in social media restricts alternatives, impacting innovation and consumer choice. A ruling against Meta would prompt a re-evaluation of acquisition assessments by regulators, reinforcing the need for policies that foster a competitive marketplace and protect consumers.
