- Malaysia’s major telecom operators are taking ownership stakes in the national 5G network previously run by state-backed Digital Nasional Berhad (DNB).
- The change reflects a shift towards industry-led deployment, though questions remain about competition and long-term investment.
What Happened
Malaysia’s major telecom operators are moving to take control of the country’s national 5G infrastructure, marking a major shift in how the network will be run. Local mobile operators are acquiring stakes in Digital Nasional Berhad (DNB), the government-backed company responsible for building the country’s 5G network.
DNB was originally established by the Malaysian government to deploy a single wholesale 5G network. Under this model, mobile operators would purchase capacity from one shared infrastructure provider rather than building their own networks.
The approach was controversial from the start. Some operators argued that a single wholesale network could limit competition and reduce flexibility for service providers.
Under the new structure, major Malaysian telecom companies—including CelcomDigi, Maxis, Telekom Malaysia, and U Mobile—are acquiring ownership stakes in the 5G infrastructure entity. This effectively gives the operators more direct influence over the network’s future development.
The government had previously indicated that a second 5G network might eventually be introduced to increase competition. However, the details of how that system would operate remain unclear.
Malaysia’s original centralized rollout allowed the network to expand quickly. DNB reported high population coverage within a relatively short time. Still, industry debate continued about whether the model would deliver long-term innovation or simply consolidate infrastructure control.
Also Read: https://btw.media/it-infrastructure/ericsson-and-chunghwa-accelerate-5g-sa-and-6g-future/
Why It’s Important
The ownership shift reflects a broader debate about how best to deploy national telecom infrastructure. Governments sometimes favor centralized networks to accelerate deployment and reduce duplication of investment. Operators, however, often argue that competition drives innovation and service quality.
Malaysia’s experience illustrates the trade-offs between these two approaches. A single wholesale network can lower initial costs and speed up rollout. Yet it can also reduce incentives for operators to differentiate their services.
Giving telecom companies ownership stakes may address some of these concerns. Operators now have stronger incentives to invest in network expansion and improve performance.
However, the new arrangement may not completely resolve the underlying policy questions. If a small group of operators collectively controls the infrastructure, regulators will still need to ensure fair access and pricing.
Malaysia’s decision could also influence other countries considering shared 5G networks. Governments across Asia, Africa, and Europe are watching closely as they weigh different models for deploying next-generation connectivity.
Ultimately, the Malaysian case highlights how network governance—not just technology—can shape the success of 5G infrastructure. Whether operator ownership leads to stronger competition or simply shifts control within the industry remains to be seen.
Also Read: https://btw.media/it-infrastructure/ai-enhanced-6g-indoor-test-in-japan-improves-speeds-by-18/
