- India’s budget allows foreign firms to fund equipment for contract manufacturers in customs-bonded zones without near-term tax risk.
- The change supports export-oriented electronics manufacturing but leaves questions about domestic value creation.
What happened
India’s government, as part of its 2026–27 federal budget, has amended its tax code to permit foreign companies to fund machinery for contract manufacturers without facing local tax liabilities for five years. This provision applies to “customs-bonded” facilities—industrial zones treated as outside India’s customs territory—and is slated to remain in effect until the 2030–31 tax year.
The reform is widely seen as a direct response to lobbying by Apple Inc., which had been concerned that funding high-end iPhone production equipment for its India partners could create a “business connection” under Indian tax law, possibly triggering a tax on its profits. Under previous rules, Apple’s contract manufacturers, such as Foxconn and Tata, were forced to shoulder the expense themselves to avoid such risks.
Finance officials say the change will remove a significant barrier for companies seeking to invest in Indian electronics manufacturing and reduce upfront cost burdens, potentially leading to faster investment. However, the exemption applies only to export-oriented customs-bonded zones; devices produced for the domestic market will still attract import duties if sold locally.
Why it’s important
India has been striving to build its role in global electronics supply chains, seeking to diversify production away from China and increase high-value manufacturing at home. The new tax certainty could encourage multinational firms to accelerate investment in production lines and tooling—a key step given recent goals to boost manufacturing and exports in sectors from semiconductors to consumer electronics.
That context aligns with broader policy efforts under initiatives like Make in India—a program dating from 2014 aimed at boosting the contribution of manufacturing to the economy. However, independent assessments indicate the manufacturing share of India’s GDP has struggled to grow significantly despite such incentives.
While the budget tweak offers clarity, its focus on customs-bonded areas and exports raises questions about whether it will meaningfully expand domestic value-addition or simply facilitate foreign firms leveraging India’s lower-cost assembly hubs. Investors and policymakers will be watching whether this and similar measures translate into sustained capital flows and jobs—or merely shift the production footprint without deeper industrial transformation.
