- ICANN took legal action in Mauritius to protect the fairness and transparency of AFRINIC’s troubled board election.
- AFRINIC faces global scrutiny, with ICANN and the NRO signalling reform before any future elections proceed.
What triggered ICANN’s intervention
In June 2025, ICANN formally warned the court-appointed receiver of AFRINIC, expressing “grave concern” about voting irregularities during the June 23 board election, particularly regarding the use of Powers of Attorney and potential conflicts within the nomination committee. Reports claimed proxy forms were wrongly used to cast votes on behalf of legitimate members, prompting ICANN to demand detailed explanations and fresh procedural reforms.
By 20 June, ICANN had succeeded in securing a legal ruling requiring the receiver to clarify membership records, reconstitute the nomination committee, and publish detailed remedial steps before proceeding with the election. These actions underscored ICANN’s commitment to upholding regional registry integrity under its global framework.
Also read: ICANN threatens to derecognize AFRINIC after years of silence
Also read: ICANN’s opposition to legal POAs will deter participation in AFRINIC elections
Election chaos and suspension
On election day, widespread confusion and last-minute irregularities emerged. Near the end of in-person voting on 23 June, elections were suspended amid allegations of invalid Powers of Attorney—and some possible duplicate voting. Police complaints followed, and within days the election was formally annulled to allow further investigation.
Following the annulment, ICANN’s President and CEO, Kurt Lindqvist, criticised what he called a “shocking” breach of standards and reiterated that AFRINIC could face compliance review or sanctions unless transparency improved.
NRO and regional support for accountability
The Number Resource Organization (NRO), which represents all five regional internet registries, echoed ICANN’s stance. In a public statement, the NRO reaffirmed its commitment to “open, transparent, and high-integrity governance processes,” urging AFRINIC to resolve issues through established multistakeholder methods.
What’s at stake?
AFRINIC manages IP address distribution for 54 countries and plays a key role in internet operations across Africa. Any hint of compromised governance risks its credibility and technical stability. ICANN’s warnings reflect not just regional concerns but also the global implications of election failures. The use of ICP‑2 framework means that AFRINIC could face sanctions or even loss of regional registry status if it does not demonstrate full compliance.
Tensions over regional autonomy
Some observers argue that ICANN’s aggressive legal intervention risks overshadowing local democracy and judicial independence. While ICANN insists it aims to support free and fair elections, critics say imposing global oversight on a locally governed body sets a worrying precedent.
Moving forward: reform or reproach?
With elections annulled and a new vote scheduled by 30 September 2025 under Mauritian court supervision, AFRINIC must act swiftly. Steps demanded by ICANN include publication of election investigations, transparent nomination procedures, strengthened oversight, and member-informed reforms. Acting on these will be essential for AFRINIC to reaffirm its legitimacy and restore trust across its membership.
