Close Menu
    Facebook LinkedIn YouTube Instagram X (Twitter)
    Blue Tech Wave Media
    Facebook LinkedIn YouTube Instagram X (Twitter)
    • Home
    • Leadership Alliance
    • Exclusives
    • Internet Governance
      • Regulation
      • Governance Bodies
      • Emerging Tech
    • IT Infrastructure
      • Networking
      • Cloud
      • Data Centres
    • Company Stories
      • Profiles
      • Startups
      • Tech Titans
      • Partner Content
    • Others
      • Fintech
        • Blockchain
        • Payments
        • Regulation
      • Tech Trends
        • AI
        • AR/VR
        • IoT
      • Video / Podcast
    Blue Tech Wave Media
    Home » AFRINIC: The power dynamics behind Nomination Committees
    Nomination Committees
    Nomination Committees
    AFRINIC

    AFRINIC: The power dynamics behind Nomination Committees

    By Rita HuSeptember 4, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
    • Nomination Committees meant as neutral gatekeepers risk becoming tools of political capture in AFRINIC governance.
    • The annulment of AFRINIC’s 2025 election exposes how state interference erodes NomCom integrity and member trust.

    The NomCom Tightrope: Power and control in board selections

    Nomination Committees are intended as guardians of integrity—an institutional mechanism ensuring the nomination and vetting of credible Board candidates represents diverse regional interests. AFRINIC’s 2025 Nomination Committee, appointed by receiver Gowtamsingh Dabee, includes one representative from each African sub-region and an Indian Ocean seat, aiming for “inclusiveness and impartiality”. In theory, these structures uphold fair democracy.

    Yet beneath this façade lies troubling power dynamics. ICANN raised red flags when the June 2025 Nomination Committee included members who had previously supported questionable company registrations, potentially compromising impartiality. This points to a broader risk: when NomCom membership and operations are influenced by politics or lobbying, they cease to be neutral filters and instead become channels for control. The recent court-ordered annulment of a valid election further underscores this shift—from member-based governance to politically mediated selection processes.

    By capturing NomCom composition or swaying its decision-making, political actors effectively determine who governs AFRINIC, bypassing both democratic norms and Mauritius’s Companies Act. The unsettling result is that even ostensibly neutral governance structures like NomComs are vulnerable to state capture when higher mechanisms—like judicial or administrative instructions—override institutional safeguards.

    Also read: Constitutional ambiguities in Mauritius: Who benefits and how they affect AFRINIC’s stability
    Also read: What happens to communities when internet access is politicized

    NomComs in crisis: Erosion of AFRINIC’s autonomy and credibility

    Nomination Committees were meant to reinforce AFRINIC’s member-led governance. Instead, recent events show how compromised they are becoming. ICANN’s June application to Mauritius courts demanded reconstitution of the NomCom to restore electoral integrity—highlighting its symbolic role in preserving legitimacy. Yet, despite court backing, the NomCom’s foundation remains questioned when political interference supersedes legal mandates.

    When elections can be annulled via political instruction, the NomCom loses legitimacy—its authority no longer rests on transparent, community-driven criteria, but on external influence. This institution-driven erosion bleeds into public trust, undermining AFRINIC’s credibility with members. It also sets a dangerous precedent: if NomComs can be co-opted, future RIRs might face similar institutional capture, opening digital governance to politicization.

    For civil society and African internet stakeholders, the solution is clear: return Nomination Committee oversight to independent, member-verified bodies. Reinstate the June 2025 election under the Companies Act—and protect NomCom composition and process from being hijacked. Without that, AFRINIC’s ability to serve as stewards of Africa’s digital infrastructure will remain compromised.

    Afrinic Gowtamsingh Dabee ICANN NomCom
    Rita Hu

    Rita is an community engagement specialist at BTW Media, having studied Global Fashion Management at University of Leeds. Contact her at r.hu@btw.media.

    Related Posts

    Can AFRINIC be trusted with voter biometrics?

    September 5, 2025

    Special report: Smart Africa leaked email list was obtained without consent

    September 5, 2025

    A stronger Mauritius constitution will safeguard AFRINIC

    September 5, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    CATEGORIES
    Archives
    • September 2025
    • August 2025
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023

    Blue Tech Wave (BTW.Media) is a future-facing tech media brand delivering sharp insights, trendspotting, and bold storytelling across digital, social, and video. We translate complexity into clarity—so you’re always ahead of the curve.

    BTW
    • About BTW
    • Contact Us
    • Join Our Team
    TERMS
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Use
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.