- The FTC acted against five firms using AI deceptively, suspending e-commerce scams and settling with DoNotPay and Rytr over misleading services.
- FTC Chair Khan stressed no AI exemption exists for illegal activities, while internal debates continue over regulatory approaches to AI technology.
OUR TAKE
The FTC’s crackdown on deceptive AI practices marks a pivotal step in regulating technological ethics. It ensures companies remain accountable, protecting consumer rights amidst technological advancements. This underscores the necessity for transparent guidelines and responsible innovation, balancing progress with legal compliance and ethical standards.
–Vicky Wu, BTW reporter
What happened
The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has taken action against five companies for allegedly using artificial intelligence (AI) in ways that deceived and unfairly treated consumers. Three of these cases involved businesses claiming to help individuals establish e-commerce storefronts to generate passive income.
The FTC also settled with DoNotPay, a company that provided automated legal services, and Rytr, an AI writing tool accused of enabling users to create fake product reviews. DoNotPay agreed to pay $193,000 and inform customers who used its service from 2021 to 2023 about the limitations of its legal assistance feature. Meanwhile, Rytr consented to halt its review generation services, which the FTC claimed allowed users to produce thousands of reviews with minimal effort. Both companies settled without admitting fault. Rytr’s legal representative did not respond to requests for comment on the matter.
Also read: FTC’s Khan hopes to open AI models to enhance competition
Also read: FTC refers TikTok complaint to Justice Department
Why it’s important
The FTC’s actions signal a strong stance against the misuse of AI technologies, reinforcing the principle that AI does not exempt companies from adhering to existing laws. FTC Chair Lina M. Khan’s statement that “using AI tools to trick, mislead, or defraud people is illegal” underscores the agency’s commitment to consumer protection in the digital age. The settlements with DoNotPay and Rytr highlight the regulatory challenges posed by AI applications and the need for clear guidelines on ethical use.
Furthermore, the internal debate among FTC commissioners over the extent of the agency’s authority in regulating AI reflects the broader societal discussion about how to balance innovation with consumer rights. This development serves as a warning to other companies that the FTC will actively pursue those who exploit AI for deceptive practices.
