Close Menu
    Facebook LinkedIn YouTube Instagram X (Twitter)
    Blue Tech Wave Media
    Facebook LinkedIn YouTube Instagram X (Twitter)
    • Home
    • Leadership Alliance
    • Exclusives
    • Internet Governance
      • Regulation
      • Governance Bodies
      • Emerging Tech
    • IT Infrastructure
      • Networking
      • Cloud
      • Data Centres
    • Company Stories
      • Profiles
      • Startups
      • Tech Titans
      • Partner Content
    • Others
      • Fintech
        • Blockchain
        • Payments
        • Regulation
      • Tech Trends
        • AI
        • AR/VR
        • IoT
      • Video / Podcast
    Blue Tech Wave Media
    Home » Appeals court reopens lawsuit against TikTok over child’s death
    TikTok-0828
    TikTok-0828
    IT Infrastructure

    Appeals court reopens lawsuit against TikTok over child’s death

    By Iydia DingAugust 28, 2024No Comments3 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
    • A U.S. appeals court has reinstated a lawsuit filed by the mother of a 10-year-old girl who died while attempting a blackout challenge.
    • While federal law generally protects online publishers from liability for content posted by others, the court said TikTok could be liable for promoting content or using algorithms to direct it to children.

    OUR TAKE
    By choosing to promote content to specific users, TikTok is involved in the users’ viewing choices, and should therefore be responsible for the guidance it provides to minors. In order to provide a healthy online environment for minors, the government and social media platforms should be more vigilant in enforcing the age rating system and controlling the rapidly growing social media networks.
    — Iydia Ding, BTW reporter

    What happened

    A U.S. appeals court on Tuesday reinstated a lawsuit filed by the mother of a 10-year-old girl in Pennsylvania who allegedly died while attempting a viral challenge seen on TikTok, which dares people to choke until they lose consciousness. A district judge initially dismissed the lawsuit, citing Section 230 of the Communications Regulation Act of 1996, which is commonly used to protect Internet companies from liability for content posted on their websites. On Tuesday, a three-judge appeals court panel partially reversed that decision, sending the case back to a lower court for a trial.

    While federal law generally protects online publishers from liability for content posted by others, the court said TikTok could be liable for promoting content or using algorithms to direct it to children. “TikTok chooses to recommend and promote content to specific users and, in doing so, is engaging in its own first-dialect argument,” Judge Patty Shwartz of the U.S. Third Circuit Court in Philadelphia wrote in an opinion issued Tuesday. Attorneys for TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, did notCalls and emails seeking comment were immediately returned.

    Also read: Nepal lifts TikTok ban imposed for disrupting social harmony

    Also read: TikTok calls itself a foreign-owned US news organisation

    Why it’s important

    “Nylah may not have known what she was doing or that following the image on the screen would kill her. But TikTok knew Nylah would be watching because the company’s customised algorithm placed the video on her ‘For You Page’.” Judge Paul Matey wrote in part concurring in the opinion. Jeffrey Goodman, an attorney for the family, said more scrutiny of Section 230 by the courts is inevitable as technology permeates every aspect of our lives. “Today’s opinion is the clearest statement yet that Section 230 does not provide the kind of all-encompassing protection that social media companies have been claiming,” Goodman said.

    By choosing to use algorithms to promote appropriate content to specific users, TikTok is participating in the viewing choices of its users, and therefore should be held responsible for the guidance it provides to minors. In order to provide a healthy online environment for minors, the government and social media platforms should be more vigilant in enforcing the age-rating system and controlling the rapidly growing social media networks.

    lawsuit Section 230 tiktok
    Iydia Ding

    Iydia Ding is a intern reporter at BTW Media covering products. She studing at Shanghai International Studies University. Send tips to i.ding@btw.media.

    Related Posts

    Du partners with Microsoft and Nokia on UAE AI upgrade

    August 8, 2025

    Siemens Energy’s $150B backlog grows with data-centre demand

    August 8, 2025

    NTT DATA launches global unit for Microsoft Cloud and Agentic AI

    August 8, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    CATEGORIES
    Archives
    • August 2025
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023

    Blue Tech Wave (BTW.Media) is a future-facing tech media brand delivering sharp insights, trendspotting, and bold storytelling across digital, social, and video. We translate complexity into clarity—so you’re always ahead of the curve.

    BTW
    • About BTW
    • Contact Us
    • Join Our Team
    TERMS
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Use
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.