- Following diplomatic tensions at the World Economic Forum in Davos, the European Union is pushing for strategic autonomy while remaining engaged with the United States.
- European industry groups urge deeper public-private cooperation to boost competitiveness and reduce reliance on US technology leadership.
What happened: Transatlantic strain brings a new push
At the end of January 2026, European policymakers and industry leaders sought to reset the bloc’s relationship with the United States amid frictions over trade and technology policy. At the World Economic Forum in Davos, US President Donald Trump threatened tariffs tied to political disputes such as Greenland before withdrawing them following negotiations. Brussels responded with what it called a “firm but non-escalatory” diplomatic stance and a renewed call for strategic cooperation.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen acknowledged collective underinvestment in areas like Arctic security and signalled plans for investment and deeper cooperation with allies including the US, United Kingdom and Canada.
The episode has spurred digital and telecom industry voices to press for a more assertive European posture. The trade association Digital Europe cited the need for ambitious public-private partnerships to restore competitiveness and security, echoing European CEOs’ calls for action following the 2025 Draghi report.
Also Read: Telefónica chief warns Europe on cyber autonomy at Davos
Also Read: GSMA warns Europe’s Digital Networks Act may hamper telecom investment
Why it’s important
Europe’s telecoms and broader digital ecosystem remain heavily intertwined with US technology, from cloud services to signalling standards. Attempts at strategic autonomy risk disruption if not paired with concrete industrial and regulatory initiatives. A stronger European digital infrastructure would, for example, reduce dependence on US Big Tech platforms and their compliance with EU laws such as the Digital Services Act and upcoming Digital Networks Act.
From a financial perspective, firms face uncertainty when regulatory alignment shifts; regulatory divergence can impede cross-border investment while incentives for local innovation may attract new capital in cloud, AI and networking sectors. The EU’s push for a recalibrated partnership underscores the challenge of balancing sovereignty with economic and security interdependence on the US.
