- TikTok’s parent ByteDance has signed binding agreements with U.S. investors including Oracle and Silver Lake to transfer control of its U.S. operations, aiming to comply with national security requirements and avert a ban.
- The agreement leaves unresolved questions over algorithm control, data governance and the ongoing role of the Chinese parent, highlighting tensions in global tech and regulatory power.
What happened: A major deal completes years of uncertainty
TikTok, the widely used short-form video platform owned by Chinese tech giant ByteDance, has signed binding agreements to transfer control of its U.S. operations to a group of primarily American and allied investors, according to company and media reports. The move follows legislation and political pressure in the United States that sought to force a divestiture of TikTok’s American business or impose a ban on the platform.
In an internal memo reviewed by media outlets, TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew confirmed that agreements have been signed with a consortium led by Oracle Corp, the private equity firm Silver Lake and the Abu Dhabi–based investment group MGX to create a new U.S. joint venture. The transaction is expected to close on 22 January 2026, after regulatory approvals are obtained from U.S. and Chinese authorities.
Under the terms outlined so far, the newly formed TikTok USDS Joint Venture LLC will see U.S. investors take a majority share, while ByteDance itself retains a minority stake of just under 20 per cent. Affiliates of existing ByteDance investors would hold a further portion of the venture. A seven-member board with a majority of American directors will govern the new entity, which is designed to operate the platform within the U.S. market under locally compliant data and security regimes.
The deal aims to address long-standing concerns among U.S. policymakers that ByteDance’s ownership posed national security risks because of potential access to American user data by Chinese authorities. As part of the arrangements, U.S. user data will be stored domestically and systems such as algorithm training and content moderation will be handled by the U.S. entity, with oversight from partners such as Oracle.
Also read: TikTok launches AI-powered video platform to advertisers globally
Also read: TikTok Makes AI-Powered Video-Generation Tool Available to All Advertisers
Why it’s important
The TikTok divestiture saga has been years in the making, reflecting deep and unusual tensions at the intersection of technology, national security and geopolitics. Congress passed a law that would have banned the platform unless it was sold by its China-based parent, and successive presidential actions delayed enforcement as negotiations continued. This agreement may avert an outright ban, but it does not fully resolve broader concerns about foreign influence and control of digital platforms with massive user bases.
Although the deal shifts operational control to U.S. investors, it also raises questions about how effective such ownership changes can be in truly separating influence and oversight. Critics note that ByteDance’s retained stake and licensing arrangements for revenue-generating activities such as advertising and e-commerce create a hybrid structure that may resemble a franchise more than a clean divestiture. As debates continue, some lawmakers and observers argue that this kind of arrangement could still leave room for indirect influence or conflict with original legislative intent.
Another significant issue is algorithmic governance: the recommendation engine underpinning TikTok’s user experience has been focal in security debates because it shapes what users see. Under the new venture, this algorithm will be retrained on U.S. data and subject to oversight, but its ultimate origins and intellectual property ties to China raise ongoing questions about transparency, control and technical sovereignty.
The new structure will be watched closely for how it navigates data protection, content moderation and global commercial ties as TikTok continues to play a central role in social media and news consumption, especially among younger generations. Whether this precedent reshapes how governments regulate foreign-owned digital platforms remains an open question in an era of competing technological powers.
