Modify the size of initial IPv6 allocations

dify the first paragraph of section 4.5.1.3 so that it reads as follows: If the organization is an ISP, the addressing plan must not extend beyond four years. If it is not an ISP, the organization's expected life expectancy must be considered. I

addition of a new section is proposed: 4.5.1.4. Initial allocation size for LIRs that are not “ISPs” (governments, associations, academic networks or other similar cases) Org

the organization is an ISP, the addressing plan must not extend beyond four years. If it is not an ISP, the organization's expected life expectancy must be considered. I

nizations may qualify for an initial allocation larger than a /32 by submitting documentation that justifies the request. In this case, the documentation must address the following considerations: - The addressing plan must consider the organization's life expectancy. - I

This case has already occurred in other regions (e.g., RIPE and ARIN), where certain governments (Spain, Germany, USA) have seen their assignments delayed —even for years— because of a lack of an appropriate policy. The idea is to prevent this error from happening again and that, instead of lagging behind, the region will be prepared and have a proper policy in place for these cases. C

t create problems when trying to justif

t create problems when trying to justify speci

ic networks or other similar cases)

w section is proposed: 4.5.1.4. Ini

his case, the documentation must address the following considerations: - The addressing plan must consider the organization's life expectancy. - It must consider the address space needed to serve curr

his case, the documentation must address the following considerations: - The addressing plan must consider the expected longevity of the allocation. - It must consider the address space needed to serv