Toshiyuki Hosaka

公開記録では、Toshiyuki Hosaka はインターネット基盤に関わる意思決定、訴訟、ガバナンス、または運用に関係する人物として確認されています。

確認できる情報は役割: Manager of the IP Department and Internet Policy Department (APNIC 20 biography) (JPNIC)を網羅しています。

最新観測 2018

役割: Manager of the IP Department and Internet Policy Department (APNIC 20 biography) (JPNIC)

信頼度

公的役割: 現在の役職と所属は引き続き検証が必要です。
情報の種類: Toshiyuki Hosaka の公的な役割、意思決定、または法的関与は、ネットワーク投資、市場参入、インフラ政策、責任範囲に影響し得ます。この人物記録では、引用された記録と現在の役職に関する確認を分けて示します。

役職

Role:Manager of the IP Department and Internet Policy Department (APNIC 20 biography) (JPNIC)未評価履歴情報

Role:Policy SIG Chair (APNIC 24 programme) (APNIC)未評価履歴情報

Role:IP address business staff (JPNIC)· 2002 – 2008未評価履歴情報

Role:Executive Officer and Head of Corporate Planning (reported November 2019) (QTnet)未評価履歴情報

Role:Trustee for regional and nonprofit affairs (reported November 2019) (JPNIC)· 2018未評価履歴情報

出典に基づく事実

RIR ポリシーへの参加

1参加した RIR

7参加したポリシー

6ポリシーメッセージ総数

2004/09/09初回参加

2007/11/21最終参加

prop-005Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) policy for allocation of IPv6blocks to Regional InternetRegistries Adopted by all RIRs不明 · 1 ディスカッションのメッセージ
見解の一貫性: 一貫性を評価するには証拠が不十分です
The message reports consensus on the revised IANA IPv6 allocation policy with parameter flexibility. This is a meeting outcome reported by the co-chair, not a substantiated personal position, and one record cannot establish consistency or a change over time.
Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) policy for allocation of IPv6blocks to Regional InternetRegistries Adopted by all RIRs
評価: 一貫性を評価するには証拠が不十分です · The message reports consensus on the revised IANA IPv6 allocation policy with parameter flexibility. This is a meeting outcome reported by the co-chair, not a substantiated personal position, and one record cannot establish consistency or a change over time.
条件: The record reports a group or process outcome and does not establish the participant’s personal support, opposition, adoption, or implementation view.
2004/09/09
- Consensus reached for the revised proposal, with some flexibility of parameters. Flexibility is left for consensus of other regions
prop-020Application of the HD ratio to IPv4不明 · 1 ディスカッションのメッセージ
見解の一貫性: 一貫性を評価するには証拠が不十分です
The message reports no clear consensus on applying the HD ratio to IPv4 and says the proposal should remain open. This is a process summary rather than a stated personal position, and one record cannot establish consistency or a change over time.
Application of the HD ratio to IPv4
評価: 一貫性を評価するには証拠が不十分です · The message reports no clear consensus on applying the HD ratio to IPv4 and says the proposal should remain open. This is a process summary rather than a stated personal position, and one record cannot establish consistency or a change over time.
条件: The record reports a group or process outcome and does not establish the participant’s personal support, opposition, adoption, or implementation view.
2004/09/09
- There was no clear consensus.
prop-021Expansion of the initial allocation space for existing IPv6 address spaceholders不明 · 1 ディスカッションのメッセージ
見解の一貫性: 一貫性を評価するには証拠が不十分です
The message reports that the proposal to expand initial IPv6 allocations reached consensus. The report does not state Toshiyuki Hosaka’s own view, so one record cannot establish consistency or a change over time.
Expansion of the initial allocation space for existing IPv6 address spaceholders
評価: 一貫性を評価するには証拠が不十分です · The message reports that the proposal to expand initial IPv6 allocations reached consensus. The report does not state Toshiyuki Hosaka’s own view, so one record cannot establish consistency or a change over time.
条件: The record reports a group or process outcome and does not establish the participant’s personal support, opposition, adoption, or implementation view.
2004/09/09
- Consensus was reached.
A proposal to prevent the routing of “dark” address space · Expansion of the initial allocation space for existing IPv6 address spaceholders
評価: 一貫性を評価するには証拠が不十分です · The summary reports different group outcomes for two proposals, but it does not provide Toshiyuki Hosaka’s own positions on either proposal. The comparison therefore cannot establish a cross-policy consistency or inconsistency finding.
条件: The comparison concerns reported group outcomes, not a verified personal viewpoint.
2004/09/09
- Consensus was not reached.
2004/09/09
- Consensus was reached.
prop-023A proposal to prevent the routing of “dark” address space不明 · 1 ディスカッションのメッセージ
見解の一貫性: 一貫性を評価するには証拠が不十分です
The message reports that the dark-address-space proposal did not reach consensus. It is a meeting summary and does not establish Toshiyuki Hosaka’s own position; one record cannot establish consistency or a change over time.
A proposal to prevent the routing of “dark” address space
評価: 一貫性を評価するには証拠が不十分です · The message reports that the dark-address-space proposal did not reach consensus. It is a meeting summary and does not establish Toshiyuki Hosaka’s own position; one record cannot establish consistency or a change over time.
条件: The record reports a group or process outcome and does not establish the participant’s personal support, opposition, adoption, or implementation view.
2004/09/09
- Consensus was not reached.
A proposal to prevent the routing of “dark” address space · Expansion of the initial allocation space for existing IPv6 address spaceholders
評価: 一貫性を評価するには証拠が不十分です · The summary reports different group outcomes for two proposals, but it does not provide Toshiyuki Hosaka’s own positions on either proposal. The comparison therefore cannot establish a cross-policy consistency or inconsistency finding.
条件: The comparison concerns reported group outcomes, not a verified personal viewpoint.
2004/09/09
- Consensus was not reached.
2004/09/09
- Consensus was reached.
prop-026APNIC to publish address assignment statistics不明 · 0 ディスカッションのメッセージ
見解の一貫性: 明示的な立場は示されていません
prop-042Proposal to change IPv6 initial allocation criteria不明 · 1 ディスカッションのメッセージ
見解の一貫性: 明示的な立場は示されていません
prop-048IPv6 ULA-central不明 · 1 ディスカッションのメッセージ
見解の一貫性: 明示的な立場は示されていません

Toshiyuki Hosaka

信頼度

関連情報

役職

RIR ポリシーへの参加

RIR ポリシーへの参加