Alan Barrett

Das BTW-Verzeichnis bündelt öffentliche Datensätze zu Alan Barrett.

Die verfügbaren Daten umfassen Rollen: Policy Development Working Group Co-chair, elected May 2012 (AFRINIC).

Zuletzt beobachtet May 2012

Rollen: Policy Development Working Group Co-chair, elected May 2012 (AFRINIC)

Konfidenz

Öffentliche Rolle: Die zitierten öffentlichen Quellen nennen Alan Barrett als Person im Zusammenhang mit Entscheidungen, Verfahren, Governance oder Betrieb der Internet-Infrastruktur; aktuelle Funktion und Zugehörigkeit müssen weiterhin geprüft werden.
Informationstyp: Die dokumentierte öffentliche Rolle, Entscheidungen oder rechtliche Beteiligung von Alan Barrett können Netzinvestitionen, Marktzugang, Infrastrukturpolitik oder Verantwortungsgrenzen beeinflussen; dieses Dossier trennt zitierte Nachweise von der Prüfung der aktuellen Funktion.

Zugehörige Details

Alan Barrett
The PDWG unanimously elected Alan P Barrett as the other PDWG Co-Chair, to complete Dr Nyirenda’s remaining 1 year term ending June 2013.
public people profile
Alan Barrett
Alan Barrett apb at cequrux.com Sun May 18 07:07:35 UTC 2014
public people profile
Alan Barrett
Chairs: Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com> S. Moonesamy <sm+afrinic at elandsys.com>
public people profile

Zuletzt aktualisiert: 2026-09-25

Rollen

Role:Policy Development Working Group Co-chair, elected May 2012 (AFRINIC)· May 2012Noch nicht bewertetHistorisch

Role:Interim Policy Development Working Group Co-chair (documented June 2011) (AFRINIC)Noch nicht bewertetHistorisch

Quellenbelegte Fakten

Beteiligung an RIR-Richtlinien

1Beteiligte RIRs

10Beteiligte Richtlinien

13Richtliniennachrichten insgesamt

09.05.2011Erste Beteiligung

28.11.2014Letzte Beteiligung

AFPUB-2012-DNS-001No Reverse Unless AssignedUnbekannt · 1 Diskussionsbeiträge
Konsistenz der Position: Die Datenlage reicht nicht aus, um die Konsistenz zu beurteilen.
Alan reports rough consensus at AFRINIC-18 for No Reverse Unless Assigned and anticipates last call. This meeting-stage report is not a personal endorsement or a final ratification decision.
No Reverse Unless Assigned
Bewertung: Die Datenlage reicht nicht aus, um die Konsistenz zu beurteilen. · Alan reports rough consensus at AFRINIC-18 for No Reverse Unless Assigned and anticipates last call. This meeting-stage report is not a personal endorsement or a final ratification decision.
Bedingungen: Only one procedural report is supplied for this policy.
20.06.2013
The following policy proposals acheieved rough consensus during the PDP discussions at the AFRINIC-18 meeting today.
20.06.2013
* No Reverse Unless Assigned AFPUB-2012-DNS-001-DRAFT-02
afpub-2012-gen-001AFPUB-2012-GEN-001-DRAFT-02Unbekannt · 2 Diskussionsbeiträge
Konsistenz der Position: Keine ausdrückliche Position angegeben
AFPUB-2012-V4-001AFPUB-2012-V4-001-DRAFT-01Unbekannt · 2 Diskussionsbeiträge
Konsistenz der Position: Keine ausdrückliche Position angegeben
AFPUB-2013-GEN-001AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02Unbekannt · 1 Diskussionsbeiträge
Konsistenz der Position: Die Datenlage reicht nicht aus, um die Konsistenz zu beurteilen.
Alan includes Academic IPv4 Allocation among proposals that reached rough consensus at the meeting. No personal argument or later comparison for that policy is supplied here.
AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
Bewertung: Die Datenlage reicht nicht aus, um die Konsistenz zu beurteilen. · Alan includes Academic IPv4 Allocation among proposals that reached rough consensus at the meeting. No personal argument or later comparison for that policy is supplied here.
Bedingungen: Meeting consensus and subsequent last-call outcomes must remain separate.
20.06.2013
The following policy proposals acheieved rough consensus during the PDP discussions at the AFRINIC-18 meeting today.
20.06.2013
* Academic IPv4 Allocation AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01 · AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
Bewertung: Die Datenlage reicht nicht aus, um die Konsistenz zu beurteilen. · Different reported consensus outcomes for IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment and Academic IPv4 Allocation concern the meeting's treatment of different proposals. They are not evidence that Alan applies contradictory personal principles, because the message reports outcomes without stating his own substantive positions on either proposal.
Bedingungen: Both entries come from one meeting report, not two independent personal endorsements.
20.06.2013
* Academic IPv4 Allocation AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
20.06.2013
AFPUB-2013-V4-001AFPUB-2013-V4-001-DRAFT-01Unbekannt · 1 Diskussionsbeiträge
Konsistenz der Position: Die Datenlage reicht nicht aus, um die Konsistenz zu beurteilen.
The Inter RIR IPv4 Address Transfers proposal appears under the meeting's no-consensus outcome. Alan's report alone cannot be used to label him opposed to transfers or to infer a reversal.
AFPUB-2013-V4-001-DRAFT-01
Bewertung: Die Datenlage reicht nicht aus, um die Konsistenz zu beurteilen. · The Inter RIR IPv4 Address Transfers proposal appears under the meeting's no-consensus outcome. Alan's report alone cannot be used to label him opposed to transfers or to infer a reversal.
Bedingungen: No consensus at this meeting does not itself mean withdrawal or board rejection.
20.06.2013
The following policy proposal was also discussed today, but did not achieve consensus:
20.06.2013
* Inter RIR IPv4 Address Transfers AFPUB-2013-V4-001-DRAFT-01
AFPUB-2013-V4-002AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01Unbekannt · 1 Diskussionsbeiträge
Konsistenz der Position: Die Datenlage reicht nicht aus, um die Konsistenz zu beurteilen.
Alan reports that the IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment proposal did not achieve consensus at the meeting. That observation does not establish his personal opposition or how his own position changed.
AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01
Bewertung: Die Datenlage reicht nicht aus, um die Konsistenz zu beurteilen. · Alan reports that the IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment proposal did not achieve consensus at the meeting. That observation does not establish his personal opposition or how his own position changed.
Bedingungen: A report of absent consensus is not a personal verdict on the proposal.
20.06.2013
The following policy proposal was also discussed today, but did not achieve consensus:
20.06.2013
* IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01
AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01 · AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
Bewertung: Die Datenlage reicht nicht aus, um die Konsistenz zu beurteilen. · Different reported consensus outcomes for IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment and Academic IPv4 Allocation concern the meeting's treatment of different proposals. They are not evidence that Alan applies contradictory personal principles, because the message reports outcomes without stating his own substantive positions on either proposal.
Bedingungen: Both entries come from one meeting report, not two independent personal endorsements.
20.06.2013
* Academic IPv4 Allocation AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
AFPUB-2013-V6-001AFPUB-2013-V6-001-DRAFT-01Unbekannt · 1 Diskussionsbeiträge
Konsistenz der Position: Keine ausdrückliche Position angegeben
afpub-2014-gen-003Anycast resource assignments in the AFRINIC regionUnbekannt · 1 Diskussionsbeiträge
Konsistenz der Position: Keine ausdrückliche Position angegeben
AFPUB-2026-IPv4-001-DRAFT02IPv4 Soft LandingUnbekannt · 2 Diskussionsbeiträge
Konsistenz der Position: Keine ausdrückliche Position angegeben
board-statement-2014-11-25-resource-allocationAFRINIC Board statement on resource allocation — 25 November 2014Unterstützung mit Änderungen · 1 Diskussionsbeiträge
Konsistenz der Position: Die Datenlage reicht nicht aus, um die Konsistenz zu beurteilen.
Alan agrees with the board statement while emphasizing the letter and spirit of existing policy, checks proportionate to the requested space, and policy change through the PDP rather than ad hoc intervention. These positions fit together within this response; one exchange is insufficient to assess change over time. His closing question about an application is not evidence of its approval.
AFRINIC Board statement on resource allocation — 25 November 2014
Bewertung: Die Datenlage reicht nicht aus, um die Konsistenz zu beurteilen. · Alan agrees with the board statement while emphasizing the letter and spirit of existing policy, checks proportionate to the requested space, and policy change through the PDP rather than ad hoc intervention. These positions fit together within this response; one exchange is insufficient to assess change over time. His closing question about an application is not evidence of its approval.
Bedingungen: The response expresses a principle of policy-bound administration, not a verified decision on an individual application.
26.11.2014
I am in agreement with all of it
26.11.2014
both the letter and the spirit of the existing policies.
26.11.2014
the correct remedial action is not to petition the staff or the board to do things outside the policy, but rather to go through the policy development process to change the policy.