- EU regulators fined X €120 million under online-content rules and are expanding scrutiny to other major platforms.
- The crackdown reflects growing pressure under new EU laws — including the Digital Services Act (DSA) and Digital Markets Act (DMA) — seeking fair competition and transparency.
What happened: Europe renews clampdown on big-tech giants
The European Commission has stepped up its efforts to regulate large technology companies. On 5 December 2025, it imposed a €120 million fine on X (formerly known as Twitter) for breaching transparency and content-moderation obligations under the DSA. The violations included misleading verification practices, insufficient advertising transparency and restricting researcher access to public data.
But the enforcement actions do not stop there. The Commission is expanding investigations into other major platforms, including those designated as “gatekeepers” under the DMA. These include global tech giants such as Google, Apple, Amazon, Meta, and more, scrutinising whether their business practices suppress competition or limit consumer choice.
The action comes as the Commission aims to enforce a “single digital market” across the EU, where fairness, transparency and data-rights protection take precedence over unchecked growth. The current wave of fines and probes appears part of a long-term crackdown begun with the implementation of the DSA and DMA from 2023 onwards.
Also Read: Ericsson takes minority stake in LotusFlare to turbo-charge network-API monetisation
Also Read: Most smartphone users would pay extra for satellite services
Why it’s important
This crackdown could reshape the future of global digital services. For platforms operating in Europe, compliance will no longer be optional — transparency, fair algorithmic practices and data access standards must be met or risk heavy fines.
The move offers smaller rivals a chance to compete more fairly. By challenging dominant players’ bundling and platform-lock strategies, regulators may open up space for innovation, new services and competitive alternatives. For European users, the net result could be greater choice, more privacy rights and improved content governance.
At the same time, this aggressive regulatory stance may deepen tensions with governments outside Europe, particularly in the United States — where many of the targeted companies are headquartered. Diverging digital-governance philosophies could reshape the global tech landscape and influence future legislation beyond the EU’s borders.
