Tim McGinnis

Tim McGinnis importa porque los cambios en su rol, relaciones, posicion de gobernanza o alcance operativo pueden afectar las operaciones de red y la visibilidad del mercado.

Los datos disponibles abarcan Cargos: IP Analyst / Hostmaster / LIR Trainer (2002–2005) (RIPE NCC).

Última observación 2026-09-25

Cargos: IP Analyst / Hostmaster / LIR Trainer (2002–2005) (RIPE NCC)

Confianza

Rol público: Tim McGinnis se sigue como persona, con evidencia que aclara su identidad, rol o contexto operativo.

Detalles relacionados

Tim McGinnis
Respalda la identidad, el rol o el contexto organizativo de Tim McGinnis.
public people profile

Última actualización: 2026-09-25

Cargos

Role:IP Analyst / Hostmaster / LIR Trainer (2002–2005) (RIPE NCC)Sin evaluarHistórico

Role:Education Manager and Lead Trainer (2012) (Internet Systems Consortium)Sin evaluarHistórico

Role:Former Policy Development Working Group Co-chair (reported in 2015) (AFRINIC)Sin evaluarHistórico

Hechos con fuentes

Participación en políticas RIR

1RIR en los que participó

9Políticas en las que participó

48Mensajes de políticas

7 may 2008Primera participación

7 dic 2014Última participación

afpub-2008-gen-001hereDesconocida · 9 Mensajes de discusión
Coherencia del punto de vista: No se expresa una postura explícita
AFPUB-2012-DNS-001No Reverse Unless AssignedApoyo con cambios · 6 Mensajes de discusión
Coherencia del punto de vista: Coherente
Tim continues to seek better assignment registration while revising the enforcement mechanism and clarifying its scope. He explicitly uses discretionary removal authority and explains that direct end-user assignments already entered by registry staff can receive reverse delegation. In June 2013 he offers to withdraw if the community rejects this approach; that conditional offer does not contradict his original invitation to find a better solution.
No Reverse Unless Assigned
Evaluación: Coherente · Tim continues to seek better assignment registration while revising the enforcement mechanism and clarifying its scope. He explicitly uses discretionary removal authority and explains that direct end-user assignments already entered by registry staff can receive reverse delegation. In June 2013 he offers to withdraw if the community rejects this approach; that conditional offer does not contradict his original invitation to find a better solution.
Condiciones: The draft's MAY wording permits rather than mandates removal of reverse delegation. · The author qualifies his recollection about staff registration; his explanation is not a new adopted policy text. · The June message neither records an actual withdrawal nor proves the absence of community support.
17 abr 2012
someone will have a better idea about how to encourage the registration of assignments.
5 dic 2012
pls note, I have used a "MAY" instead of a "SHALL" or a "MUST" in 3.3.
17 dic 2012
In short, no, it doesn't apply to end-user space.
19 jun 2013
If there is no consensus that this is the way to rectify the problem of getting people to register their assignments, I would be happy to withdraw this proposal
afpub-2012-gen-002Regional Internet Registry Privacy | AFPUB-2012-GEN-002-DRAFT-02Desconocida · 1 Mensajes de discusión
Coherencia del punto de vista: No hay pruebas suficientes para evaluar la coherencia
As PDWG co-chair, Tim apologizes for delayed communication and offers an Open Policy Hour slot for the privacy proposal. This is facilitation of discussion, not evidence of support, opposition or a change in his personal privacy position.
Regional Internet Registry Privacy | AFPUB-2012-GEN-002-DRAFT-02
Evaluación: No hay pruebas suficientes para evaluar la coherencia · As PDWG co-chair, Tim apologizes for delayed communication and offers an Open Policy Hour slot for the privacy proposal. This is facilitation of discussion, not evidence of support, opposition or a change in his personal privacy position.
Condiciones: Only a scheduling exchange is included for this policy.
11 may 2012
would it be ok if we put it in the Open Policy Hour with the other proposals that were made after the deadline?
AFPUB-2012-V4-001AFPUB-2012-V4-001-DRAFT-01Apoyo · 2 Mensajes de discusión
Coherencia del punto de vista: No hay pruebas suficientes para evaluar la coherencia
Tim introduces the 2012 Anycast proposal as a starting point for discussion. This establishes advocacy at that time, but the single reviewed message cannot show whether his position stayed unchanged through later revisions.
AFPUB-2012-V4-001-DRAFT-01
Evaluación: No hay pruebas suficientes para evaluar la coherencia · Tim introduces the 2012 Anycast proposal as a starting point for discussion. This establishes advocacy at that time, but the single reviewed message cannot show whether his position stayed unchanged through later revisions.
Condiciones: Submitting a strawman does not establish consensus or endorsement of every later draft.
17 abr 2012
Below is the proposal on Anycast I submitted to pdwg last week.
AFPUB-2012-V4-001-DRAFT-01 · Anycast resource assignments in the AFRINIC region
Evaluación: Coherente · His introduction of an Anycast proposal in 2012 and support for clarification and adoption of the 2014 Anycast proposal show compatible advocacy for an Anycast policy path. They do not establish that the two proposals have identical text or that he endorsed every intervening version.
Condiciones: The comparison concerns the positions expressed in these messages, not equivalence between the policy versions.
17 abr 2012
Below is the proposal on Anycast I submitted to pdwg last week.
28 nov 2014
sure, I am all for future proofing as APB suggests.
7 dic 2014
AFPUB-2013-GEN-001AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02Desconocida · 3 Mensajes de discusión
Coherencia del punto de vista: No se expresa una postura explícita
AFPUB-2013-V4-001AFPUB-2013-V4-001-DRAFT-01Desconocida · 5 Mensajes de discusión
Coherencia del punto de vista: No se expresa una postura explícita
afpub-2014-gen-003Anycast resource assignments in the AFRINIC regionApoyo · 3 Mensajes de discusión
Coherencia del punto de vista: Coherente
Tim supports clarifying and future-proofing the 2014 Anycast proposal, then states that he is in favor during last call. The later brief endorsement is compatible with his earlier support for clarification; it does not itself prove that every suggested change was incorporated.
Anycast resource assignments in the AFRINIC region
Evaluación: Coherente · Tim supports clarifying and future-proofing the 2014 Anycast proposal, then states that he is in favor during last call. The later brief endorsement is compatible with his earlier support for clarification; it does not itself prove that every suggested change was incorporated.
Condiciones: The final short endorsement supplies no further reasons or implementation evidence.
28 nov 2014
sure, I am all for future proofing as APB suggests.
28 nov 2014
I would support the change that Alan suggests in the interests of clarity.
7 dic 2014
in favor.
AFPUB-2012-V4-001-DRAFT-01 · Anycast resource assignments in the AFRINIC region
Evaluación: Coherente · His introduction of an Anycast proposal in 2012 and support for clarification and adoption of the 2014 Anycast proposal show compatible advocacy for an Anycast policy path. They do not establish that the two proposals have identical text or that he endorsed every intervening version.
Condiciones: The comparison concerns the positions expressed in these messages, not equivalence between the policy versions.
17 abr 2012
afpub-2014-gen-004Resource Reservations for Internet Exchange PointsDesconocida · 2 Mensajes de discusión
Coherencia del punto de vista: No se expresa una postura explícita
AFPUB-2026-IPv4-001-DRAFT02IPv4 Soft LandingDesconocida · 17 Mensajes de discusión
Coherencia del punto de vista: No se expresa una postura explícita