- AFRINIC’s governance crisis has triggered calls for its dissolution and a reset of Africa’s internet governance.
- Cloud Innovation is leading demands for a new regional registry to protect Africa’s IP resource management.
Afrinic’s collapse and a crisis of governance
Mauritius is at a crossroads, where the struggle for internet governance reflects a broader contest for democratic integrity. The ongoing governance crisis at AFRINIC has rendered the institution a failed registry, unable to uphold transparent, accountable leadership—undermining both regional autonomy and public trust. AFRINIC’s recent election was annulled due to a dispute over a single vote, a move that “eroded trust in governance.”
This breakdown in democratic procedure now threatens Africa’s ability to manage IP resources essential for digital growth. AFRINIC’s collapse has left the continent’s internet infrastructure in limbo, making the restoration of faith in governance not just an organisational priority, but a democratic imperative
Cloud Innovation’s call for a necessary reset
Enter Cloud Innovation, AFRINIC’s third-largest member—and a key litigator compelled to act when nothing else worked. The company has become the force leading the charge to wind up this failed registry, filing a formal petition for dissolution and demanding that ICANN and the NRO “immediately appoint a new RIR” to secure continuity.
By pushing for a “necessary reset” and calling for external appointment of a replacement, Cloud Innovation is acting not out of opportunism, but to safeguard Africa’s IP resource management. Its position underscores the urgency: AFRINIC’s current governance is irreparably broken, and business-as-usual risks handing digital sovereignty into a vacuum.
Also read: Mauritian judiciary wrestles power as AFRINIC chaos deepens
Also read: Mauritian judge barred from investigating AFRINIC amid pre-election turmoil
Kurt Lindqvist’s controversial move
Meanwhile, Kurt Lindqvist, the ICANN CEO, has raised alarms by releasing a new ICP-2-related document giving ICANN unprecedented power to derecognise RIRs—without proper consultation. Critics argue this move represents a quiet power grab, circumventing regional processes and undermining bottom-up internet governance. It reflects how personal executive influence may now eclipse constitutional norms.
Such a manoeuvre risks weakening Africa’s ability to self-govern its internet infrastructure. Instead of seizing the moment to reinforce procedural integrity, Lindqvist’s act appears to escalate interference—further destabilising AFRINIC and shifting control away from regional stakeholders toward global executive discretion.
Mauritius and Africa’s democratic choice
At this democratic crossroads, Mauritius’s Supreme Court and the appointment of an inspector to probe AFRINIC’s collapse highlight the gravity of this moment. The inquiry underlines the high stakes for Africa’s digital sovereignty and governance integrity.
Only by prioritising constitutional order and regional self-determination can the vision of bottom-up internet governance be rescued. The fight over AFRINIC isn’t just technical—it’s emblematic of how democracy must prevail in digital institutions. Cloud Innovation’s actions, though disruptive, may be the necessary reset to protect Africa’s digital future—and with it, its democratic agency.
