Tim McGinnis

تُعرّف السجلات العامة المستشهد بها Tim McGinnis كشخص مرتبط بقرارات أو دعاوى أو حوكمة أو عمليات ذات صلة بالبنية التحتية للإنترنت؛ ولا يزال المنصب والانتماء الحاليان بحاجة إلى تحقق.

تشمل الأدلة المتاحة الأدوار: IP Analyst / Hostmaster / LIR Trainer (2002–2005) (RIPE NCC).

الأحدث 2026-09-25

الأدوار: IP Analyst / Hostmaster / LIR Trainer (2002–2005) (RIPE NCC)

الثقة

نوع المعلومات: قد يؤثر الدور العام أو القرارات أو المشاركة القانونية الموثقة لـ Tim McGinnis في الاستثمار في الشبكات أو النفاذ إلى السوق أو سياسات البنية التحتية أو حدود المسؤولية؛ ويفصل هذا الملف بين السجلات المستشهد بها والتحقق من المنصب الحالي.

التفاصيل ذات الصلة

Tim McGinnis
Secondment Tim McGinnis - AfriNIC (PDPWG)
public people profile
Tim McGinnis
Tim McGinnis aka McTim
public people profile

آخر تحديث: 2026-09-25

الأدوار

Role:IP Analyst / Hostmaster / LIR Trainer (2002–2005) (RIPE NCC)لم يتم التقييم بعدتاريخي

Role:Education Manager and Lead Trainer (2012) (Internet Systems Consortium)لم يتم التقييم بعدتاريخي

Role:Former Policy Development Working Group Co-chair (reported in 2015) (AFRINIC)لم يتم التقييم بعدتاريخي

حقائق موثقة

المشاركة في سياسات السجلات الإقليمية

1السجلات التي شارك فيها

9السياسات التي شارك فيها

48إجمالي رسائل السياسات

07‏/05‏/2008أول مشاركة

07‏/12‏/2014آخر مشاركة

afpub-2008-gen-001hereغير معروفة · 9 رسائل النقاش
اتساق وجهة النظر: لم يُذكر موقف صريح
AFPUB-2012-DNS-001No Reverse Unless Assignedتأييد مع تعديلات · 6 رسائل النقاش
اتساق وجهة النظر: متسق
Tim continues to seek better assignment registration while revising the enforcement mechanism and clarifying its scope. He explicitly uses discretionary removal authority and explains that direct end-user assignments already entered by registry staff can receive reverse delegation. In June 2013 he offers to withdraw if the community rejects this approach; that conditional offer does not contradict his original invitation to find a better solution.
No Reverse Unless Assigned
التقييم: متسق · Tim continues to seek better assignment registration while revising the enforcement mechanism and clarifying its scope. He explicitly uses discretionary removal authority and explains that direct end-user assignments already entered by registry staff can receive reverse delegation. In June 2013 he offers to withdraw if the community rejects this approach; that conditional offer does not contradict his original invitation to find a better solution.
الشروط: The draft's MAY wording permits rather than mandates removal of reverse delegation. · The author qualifies his recollection about staff registration; his explanation is not a new adopted policy text. · The June message neither records an actual withdrawal nor proves the absence of community support.
17‏/04‏/2012
someone will have a better idea about how to encourage the registration of assignments.
05‏/12‏/2012
pls note, I have used a "MAY" instead of a "SHALL" or a "MUST" in 3.3.
17‏/12‏/2012
In short, no, it doesn't apply to end-user space.
19‏/06‏/2013
If there is no consensus that this is the way to rectify the problem of getting people to register their assignments, I would be happy to withdraw this proposal
afpub-2012-gen-002Regional Internet Registry Privacy | AFPUB-2012-GEN-002-DRAFT-02غير معروفة · 1 رسائل النقاش
اتساق وجهة النظر: الأدلة غير كافية لتقييم الاتساق
As PDWG co-chair, Tim apologizes for delayed communication and offers an Open Policy Hour slot for the privacy proposal. This is facilitation of discussion, not evidence of support, opposition or a change in his personal privacy position.
Regional Internet Registry Privacy | AFPUB-2012-GEN-002-DRAFT-02
التقييم: الأدلة غير كافية لتقييم الاتساق · As PDWG co-chair, Tim apologizes for delayed communication and offers an Open Policy Hour slot for the privacy proposal. This is facilitation of discussion, not evidence of support, opposition or a change in his personal privacy position.
الشروط: Only a scheduling exchange is included for this policy.
11‏/05‏/2012
would it be ok if we put it in the Open Policy Hour with the other proposals that were made after the deadline?
AFPUB-2012-V4-001AFPUB-2012-V4-001-DRAFT-01تأييد · 2 رسائل النقاش
اتساق وجهة النظر: الأدلة غير كافية لتقييم الاتساق
Tim introduces the 2012 Anycast proposal as a starting point for discussion. This establishes advocacy at that time, but the single reviewed message cannot show whether his position stayed unchanged through later revisions.
AFPUB-2012-V4-001-DRAFT-01
التقييم: الأدلة غير كافية لتقييم الاتساق · Tim introduces the 2012 Anycast proposal as a starting point for discussion. This establishes advocacy at that time, but the single reviewed message cannot show whether his position stayed unchanged through later revisions.
الشروط: Submitting a strawman does not establish consensus or endorsement of every later draft.
17‏/04‏/2012
Below is the proposal on Anycast I submitted to pdwg last week.
AFPUB-2012-V4-001-DRAFT-01 · Anycast resource assignments in the AFRINIC region
التقييم: متسق · His introduction of an Anycast proposal in 2012 and support for clarification and adoption of the 2014 Anycast proposal show compatible advocacy for an Anycast policy path. They do not establish that the two proposals have identical text or that he endorsed every intervening version.
الشروط: The comparison concerns the positions expressed in these messages, not equivalence between the policy versions.
17‏/04‏/2012
Below is the proposal on Anycast I submitted to pdwg last week.
28‏/11‏/2014
sure, I am all for future proofing as APB suggests.
07‏/12‏/2014
in favor.
AFPUB-2013-GEN-001AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02غير معروفة · 3 رسائل النقاش
اتساق وجهة النظر: لم يُذكر موقف صريح
AFPUB-2013-V4-001AFPUB-2013-V4-001-DRAFT-01غير معروفة · 5 رسائل النقاش
اتساق وجهة النظر: لم يُذكر موقف صريح
afpub-2014-gen-003Anycast resource assignments in the AFRINIC regionتأييد · 3 رسائل النقاش
اتساق وجهة النظر: متسق
Tim supports clarifying and future-proofing the 2014 Anycast proposal, then states that he is in favor during last call. The later brief endorsement is compatible with his earlier support for clarification; it does not itself prove that every suggested change was incorporated.
Anycast resource assignments in the AFRINIC region
التقييم: متسق · Tim supports clarifying and future-proofing the 2014 Anycast proposal, then states that he is in favor during last call. The later brief endorsement is compatible with his earlier support for clarification; it does not itself prove that every suggested change was incorporated.
الشروط: The final short endorsement supplies no further reasons or implementation evidence.
28‏/11‏/2014
sure, I am all for future proofing as APB suggests.
28‏/11‏/2014
I would support the change that Alan suggests in the interests of clarity.
07‏/12‏/2014
in favor.
AFPUB-2012-V4-001-DRAFT-01 · Anycast resource assignments in the AFRINIC region
التقييم: متسق · His introduction of an Anycast proposal in 2012 and support for clarification and adoption of the 2014 Anycast proposal show compatible advocacy for an Anycast policy path. They do not establish that the two proposals have identical text or that he endorsed every intervening version.
الشروط: The comparison concerns the positions expressed in these messages, not equivalence between the policy versions.
17‏/04‏/2012
afpub-2014-gen-004Resource Reservations for Internet Exchange Pointsغير معروفة · 2 رسائل النقاش
اتساق وجهة النظر: لم يُذكر موقف صريح
AFPUB-2026-IPv4-001-DRAFT02IPv4 Soft Landingغير معروفة · 17 رسائل النقاش
اتساق وجهة النظر: لم يُذكر موقف صريح